1959 Morris Mini-Minor road test - Throwback Thursday

Such comments go to show just how bloated modern motors have become, when you consider that something considered a family car when it was designed not even 60 years ago is now dwarfed to an almost comical degree by even the smallest of city cars.

“When one is standing beside the car it appears low and small, 10in wheels accentuating this effect. Inside, however, it is found that there is as much space, or more, than in larger cars.”

This was due to the Mini’s innovative design: “With the 847cc 4-cylinder engine set across the nose, and beneath it the entire transmission for driving the front wheels, nearly 80 percent of the car’s overall length of 10ft is made available for passenger and luggage accommodations. Head and elbow room are adequate for both front and rear seat passengers. The rear seat is wide enough for two adults and a small child on shorter journeys.”

Our road testers also complimented the driving position for comfort and visibility, and said the unusually erect steering was easy to get used to.

Although the “very long” gearstick was stiff and awkwardly positioned, it was decent to use: “The clutch is light and sweet and, in fact, the whole transmission feels as smooth as in a good conventional front-engined, rear-drive car.”

The Mini’s light weight proved advantageous with regards to power, with livelier performance than the slightly bigger-engined Morris Minor 1000.

“The engine peaks at higher revs, namely 5500rpm, and it is smooth throughout the range,” we said. “It is also quiet up to 55mph in top gear but noisier than at the natural cruising gait of 60mph, when the fan can be heard also."

“Throttle response is so immediate, and the engine so willing to rev freely, that is often necessary to restrain it from exceeding the chosen speed,” we continued, commenting that the flexible engine "showed no distress even at its top speed of just over 70mph."

Such was the success of the design that a normal man would not find any difference in driving between the Mini and a regular rear-driven car, we believed, saying: “It has its wheels at the extremities, and, together with an all-independent suspension system employing rubber as the springing medium, this has brought about a very high level of stability and road holding.”

We even somewhat foreshadowed the Mini’s future motorsport popularity. “When fast cornering is indulged in, the behaviour is clear cut and predictable and the car plays no tricks,” we said, also noting that roll was negligible.

It was comfortable for passengers, too: “Riding comfort is very good indeed. Irregularities of British main roads are effectively absorbed and damped at any speed,” and although sometimes noisy, we found the Mini to “ride poor surfaces very well”.

Another success for the Mini was its “smooth and progressive” drum brakes with “ample power,” which Autocar’s testers could not make significantly fade.

With regards to owning, signs were good. Fuel economy worked out at 40.1mpg, or 34.8mpg in heavy traffic ­– impressive for such a car at the time.

The boot was a mild letdown, though, as we considered it to be “a little small in comparison with the space allotted to passengers”, although more items could be carried by opening the boot’s downward-hinged lid and held in using the built-in cable, while various storage in the passenger area was also impressive.

The sliding windows were also not quite up to scratch. Although their aperture was “just enough for the driver to get his head through and ample enough for hand signals”, they were “difficult to engage”. Some other rattles were also detected in the bodywork.

Maintenance would also not be too troublesome, Autocar reckoned, with “generally good under-bonnet accessibility”, and “a common oil reservoir for gearbox and transmission”.