Currently reading: JLR product boss: Driver’s cars will thrive despite greater autonomy

Jaguar Land Rover’s head of product strategy, Hanno Kirner, remains confident in the survival of enthusiast models

Enthusiast drivers are going to have more choice than ever before as autonomous technology is developed because car firms will be able to increasingly polarise their line-ups, according to Hanno Kirner, Jaguar Land Rover’s head of product strategy.

Kirner believes that while many people will be happy to use autonomous cars day to day – as taxis and shared or owned vehicles – many keen drivers will want to have vehicles they can get behind the wheel of for fun.

Reborn Jaguar XK to lead new Jag sports car family

“Whether it is SVO [JLR’s performance arm] recreating classics to modern standards or creating track-day specials, I think it will grow as autonomous driving becomes a regular part of lives,” he said. “I don’t for one second think we’ll see a generation appear with no interest in cars. Driving enthusiasts will still exist and we’ll want to engineer cars for them.

“Today, we have more demand than we can satisfy for such cars and I don’t expect that to change. Yes, there is a generation that is more interested in their phones than anything else today, but they will grow older and want to drive one day.”

The emergence of the SVR brand also casts doubt on whether Jaguar will continue to create R models as a stepping stone between hot S and extreme SVR models. Insiders say the three-tier performance line-up is proving too complex for many buyers. 

Read more

Land Rover Discovery review 

Jaguar F-Type R review 

Jaguar XE review

Join our WhatsApp community and be the first to read about the latest news and reviews wowing the car world. Our community is the best, easiest and most direct place to tap into the minds of Autocar, and if you join you’ll also be treated to unique WhatsApp content. You can leave at any time after joining - check our full privacy policy here.

Join the debate

Comments
11
Add a comment…
paddyb 28 May 2018

They also need to make sure

They also need to make sure they don't lose too many German engineers.  A decade a go you couldn't get a top job unless your name was Wolfgang.  Of course they should be developing and promoting British engineers.  But they should have the best people in the jobs and set salaries to attract the best global talent, wherever it is from.  That will lift everyone's performance and make the company's products more competitive.  The culture must come from the engineering department not finance, otherwise the tail is wagging the dog.

artill 28 May 2018

The straight 6 must be coming

The straight 6 must be coming. They wont have the V8 much longer, and they cant only offer 2.0 4 pots in Europe can they?

They are a deeply infuriating brand. they make some nicely designed cars, and generally road testers love them, but then dont finish them off all that well, offer restricted ranges, and charge way over the top prices, often leading to high early on depreciation. They are not exactly known for being all that well built either. 

I wish they would do less, but do it well. i feel now they are spreading them selves too thin

paddyb 28 May 2018

artill wrote:

artill wrote:

do less, but do it well.

 

That is entirely the key.  They are going for a proliferation of mediocre models, rather than making absolute 'gems' of cars with the engineering sophistication and build quality to command a higher margin.  You cannot scale up from a position of weakness.  I was quite impressed with the F-Pace and entirely underwhelmed with the E-Pace.

If you consider the success of BMW and Mercedes in the 1990s and 2000s, it was underpinned by relatively low volume, but impeccably well built and engineered (and expensive) models produced in the 1970s.  They then scaled up and kept the quality and engineering integrity (at least until the late 1990s).  Their repuations for quality and brand were forged in the earlier decades, and the high margins continue.

emperorbruce1 28 May 2018

Article misses the key point

I write as a long-term Jag owner currently with a V6 supercharged 3L petol F-Pace, awaiting delivery of my i-Pace. I think that the article misses the key point; The V6 petrol engines are being dropped because they no longer meet the emmissions (particulates) standards and JLR have failed to develop a strait 6 Ignium engine to replace them. This leaves a serious hole in their engine range with nothing between the 4 cylinder 2L Ignium and the V8 supercharged engine used in the SVRs. I think this was a big tactical error and JLR are pretending that it was a deliberate plan. Autocar have bought into the deception by accepting that the 5L V8 Supercharged engine is a realistic option. To use the caption "The Jaguar F-Type SVR is one of the brand's top-selling models" on the photo is an illustration of this.

The SVR models will always be rare flagship models that owners aspire to but very few people will actually buy and they will never be 'top-selling'. The F-Type itself is only low volume compared with the F-Pace, XE and even the XF and most F-Types sold do not have the SVR engine.

The SVR engine is fantastic but insane for UK roads yet the 3L supercharged V6 is a brilliant practical alternative at a sensible price. The real story here is that Jaguar are about to lose the best engine most owners will aspire to and their only choice will now be underpowered turbocharged 2L units, the excellent (but still turocharged) 3LD or the very expensive and impractical supercharged SVR.

Lets hope that the prospect of electric and hybrid powered units will help JLR cover the big hole in their ICE power plant line up.

Citytiger 28 May 2018

emperorbruce1 wrote:

emperorbruce1 wrote:

I write as a long-term Jag owner currently with a V6 supercharged 3L petol F-Pace, awaiting delivery of my i-Pace. I think that the article misses the key point; The V6 petrol engines are being dropped because they no longer meet the emmissions (particulates) standards and JLR have failed to develop a strait 6 Ignium engine to replace them. This leaves a serious hole in their engine range with nothing between the 4 cylinder 2L Ignium and the V8 supercharged engine used in the SVRs. I think this was a big tactical error and JLR are pretending that it was a deliberate plan. Autocar have bought into the deception by accepting that the 5L V8 Supercharged engine is a realistic option. To use the caption "The Jaguar F-Type SVR is one of the brand's top-selling models" on the photo is an illustration of this.

The SVR models will always be rare flagship models that owners aspire to but very few people will actually buy and they will never be 'top-selling'. The F-Type itself is only low volume compared with the F-Pace, XE and even the XF and most F-Types sold do not have the SVR engine.

The SVR engine is fantastic but insane for UK roads yet the 3L supercharged V6 is a brilliant practical alternative at a sensible price. The real story here is that Jaguar are about to lose the best engine most owners will aspire to and their only choice will now be underpowered turbocharged 2L units, the excellent (but still turocharged) 3LD or the very expensive and impractical supercharged SVR.

Lets hope that the prospect of electric and hybrid powered units will help JLR cover the big hole in their ICE power plant line up.

They had a straight 6, that was very modern, they used it in the Freelander 2, it was a Volvo lump, that could produce decent reliable power, and it would have fitted in the Evoque, E-Pace or any other product using the D8/EUCD platform, I also suspect it could easily have been adapted for other platfoms, it was certainly a better option than the current Ford derived V6. However they are apparently developing an ingenium straight 6.