Currently reading: London's war on driving has been raging since 1973

Restrictions on cars in town centres and parking limitations meant navigating London was a challenge

"In a few countries, money alone is not enough to qualify for car ownership; commissarial consent is needed as well.

"We see something of the same approach in the anti-motorist policies of the new [Labour-run] Greater London Council (GLC). A campaign is on to wage war against the motorist in the capital, in the hope that if life is made sufficiently difficult for him, he will disappear.”

Enjoy full access to the complete Autocar archive at the magazineshop.com

That might remind you of a Facebook rant by someone furious about the ULEZ or ZEV mandate, yet it doesn’t mention ‘Sadistic Khan’ or ‘Keir Stalin’, because it’s really from an Autocar editorial printed half a century ago.

“As well as priorities for buses, massive reductions in available street parking and cancellation of road-building plans, there is a deliberate move to cause motorway congestion in an attempt to slow down the flow of traffic into London,” continued Autocar.

“The whole approach of the new GLC represents a disturbing philosophy of motorist oppression, reflected throughout the country.”

One of the first acts of Reg Goodwin’s administration in April 1973 had been to bin the London Ringways plan to construct four orbital roads, the innermost connecting Hackney with Wandsworth, the outermost going as far as Sevenoaks and St Albans.

Autocar opined: “We are appalled and dismayed by this peremptory and ill-considered decision. We feel it must be disastrous for the future of the capital. From every viewpoint, including that of the conservationist lobby, some form of ring road is essential to divert traffic and allow it to flow round London without clogging the centre.”

The leader of the GLC’s Transport Committee, Evelyn Denington, told us that she would like to see special centres built off motorways outside London, where lorries’ loads could be transferred onto smaller cargo vehicles for onward transport.

As for cars, she said: “Restriction is vital. The first thing I must move on is to restrict cars coming into the central area and into other local centres a bit farther out – for example, Croydon or Kingston.”

The Conservatives’ environment minister, Geoffrey Rippon, agreed, saying separately: “[Curbs on] inessential and anti-social journeys by private cars are one of the aims of the government’s transport policy.”

"There had even been talk of black boxes and road pricing, amazingly.

Denington continued: “The first move it seems possible to make is to deal with the public car parks that are licensed by the council and see whether some of them shouldn’t be closed or whether some of them must not open before 10.15am and must be closed from 4pm to 6pm.”

Back to top

Her team eventually targeted a 40% reduction in parking capacity. She continued: “We aren’t anti-car, but we can’t be anti-social with them, ruin our city with them.

“We must [however] provide more car parks on the outside at appropriate places, such as stations. We have to integrate with British Rail, which hasn’t been done at all so far. We must provide the public transport that’s clean, comfortable, frequent, reliable and decent – and you can’t do it overnight.

“I think [stricter street parking control] will be very effective to dry up the place where you can put your car in central London. I think it should have an enormous effect.”

Denington riled Autocar again in June by announcing that Chelsea’s Albert Bridge would remain closed to vehicles once repaired and the under-construction M3 would be tapered from three lanes to one at Sunbury to “slow down the traffic”.

It’s amusing how many echoes of this story are heard in the present day – including our comment that “all this is the first step towards a communal transport system, with undertones of communist Russia”…

In 1973, of the 1.25 million commuters into London, 40% came by railway, 34% on the underground, 14% by bus and 12% by car – but that small share still meant up to 150,000 cars.

Since then, the capital has become ever more hostile to cars, such that over 90% of trips now are by public transport and 2.9 million fewer car trips are made daily than at 2000 levels.

The project wasn’t entirely fruitless: Ringway 3 and 4 were eventually combined into the M25.

Two short sections of Ringway 1 were built, albeit to the detriment of thousands of residents.

Join our WhatsApp community and be the first to read about the latest news and reviews wowing the car world. Our community is the best, easiest and most direct place to tap into the minds of Autocar, and if you join you’ll also be treated to unique WhatsApp content. You can leave at any time after joining - check our full privacy policy here.

Join the debate

Comments
1
Add a comment…
Tom Chet 21 January 2025

The photo is interesting, presumably taken looking south down Farringdon Street in the City of London.  For that part of town and by today's standards, there are a remarkable number of passenger cars.  My other observation would be how few imported vehicles are on the road.  I see Bedford, Ford and Atkinson lorries and several Ford Transits, the Austin taxis - of course - and the usual car suspects; Vauxhall, Austin, Ford, Hillman and Triumph.  The only imports I can spot are a Peugeot 504 and a Fiat 850.

As for the article, plus ca change in terms of congestion but the air quality of central London is significantly better today than in 1973. https://ourworldindata.org/london-air-pollution