Currently reading: Inside the industry: Tailpipe emissions will be a thing of the past before too long
The answer, as backwards as it may seem, could be to sell more cars

What's the best way to lower emissions from cars? To sell more cars. How so? The logic is simple.

The UK has a car parc of around 38 million; about two million new cars pour into the funnel each year; some eight million used cars change hands; and around 1.5 million cars are scrapped, at an average age of about 14.

In terms of tailpipe emissions, that funnel makes the argument simple enough to understand. Such is the rate of progress from the industry that new cars are significantly less polluting than 14-year-old ones, while the used car shuffling ensures there’s always a conveyor belt running through the parc.

But is the equation that justifies this turnaround going to change with the onset of electrification? What if the best way to lower emissions is to sell fewer cars?

To receive the latest industry news, please click here to sign up to the Autocar Business newsletter

It’s a wild theory, not least because battery tech is always advancing. But is it possible that legislators might want to extend those timelines, given the differences between an ICE and a battery and thus the green gains from keeping EVs on the road for longer?

Many will dismiss this possibility, highlighting that constant evolution of the parc improves far more than just tailpipe emissions, from safety and tech advances to keeping fashion-conscious drivers happy. But in the face of maintaining personal mobility amid a climate-change emergency, it could well happen.

Key to any considerations would be the emissions from making an EV. Looking only at CO2 and acknowledging that estimates vary, today around six tonnes are emitted for every petrol car manufactured – about 25% of its lifetime total after being driven from the forecourt to the scrapyard. On that basis, progress in lowering tailpipe emissions has just about justified the 14-year cycle of change.

In contrast, making an EV produces nine tonnes, but that’s 46% of its lifetime total, with the overall output estimated on average to be around 20% better than for an ICE car – a gap that will, of course, be widened with technological focus and investment, and which could be rapidly advanced if the car is run for longer.

Here the fun starts, partly because we’re still finding out how durable batteries are. They are typically sold with a seven-year, 100,000-mile warranty and expected to go on after that and have long second-life uses, as well as being highly recyclable. Add in the fact EVs have few running parts and maybe it will be the right thing to do environmentally to replace the battery, not the car.

It runs counter to every instinct forged in an era of consumerism; but in one led by net-zero targets, perhaps we have to think differently.

READ MORE

Analysis: New rules could make ICE engines unviable by 2026

Inside the industry: EU may force firms to cut CO2 emissions further

Road to 2030: Are the UK's clean air targets realistic and achievable?

Join the debate

Comments
9
Add a comment…
HiPo 289 24 August 2021

Hilarious that since the sales of EVs have started to take off, automotive journalists and petrolheads have started to show interest in the environment!  Now they are all about the 'need to recycle batteries' and the location of cobalt mines.  Not one of them ever talked about the environmental impact of drilling for oil, refining the stuff or burning it in polluting vehicles.    Suddenly petrolheads have become tree huggers!  Well, the facts say different.  The fact is that cobalt is mainly used in oil refining, that diesel and petrol engines are dirty, inefficient, cause way more CO2 emissions, are expensive to run and don't last as long as EVs.   It's time to change gear. 

Peter Cavellini 23 August 2021

And here we have some posts, all with valid points, seems to me that it's going to be a sort as we go along scenario, and, instead of trying to be first to market with a new product, how about sharing the development?Tesla, much as I don't wholly approve of them, they are talking about, or should I say Elon Musk is, of letting other brands share Tesla charge points,and in the future,will a warranty of two , three years be necessary?

 

Cobnapint 23 August 2021
@Deputy. Put some thought into it. It's not like deciding to have a biscuit at home when you fancy one.
You'll spend most of your time fkg about on line and waiting. Plus somebody has to bring the car to you - an unnecessary journey.