Currently reading: Lexus boss on EVs, autonomy and radical design

Yoshihiro Sawa tells Autocar why electric vehicles aren't for everyone and details Lexus's plan for future success

Lexus boss Yoshihiro Sawa has cautioned manufacturers against focusing solely on electric powertrains, saying such systems can’t meet the needs of all drivers.

The Japanese firm’s parent company, Toyota, was one of the first to invest in hybrid powertrains, but has been slower to develop pure electric vehicles. Lexus has yet to confirm when it will launch its first full EV, with Sawa telling Autocar that the environmental impact of such cars, among other things, needed careful consideration.

“Our philosophy is to provide freedom of movement, so we have to develop technology on all fronts,” said Sawa. “We understand that electric is very necessary, but we can also see that full EV will not suit everyone. You can’t make an electric Land Cruiser work, for instance, and there are people in remote parts of the world whose lives depend on that car.

“EVs currently require a long charging time and batteries that have an environmental impact at manufacture and degrade as they get older. And then, when battery cells need replacing, we have to consider plans for future use and recycling. It's a much more complex issue than the current rhetoric perhaps suggests. I prefer to approach the future in a more honest way.”

Yoshihiro sawa2

That approach was demonstrated by the LF-1 concept Lexus unveiled earlier this year. It was designed to accommodate electric, fuel-cell, hybrid and petrol powertrains.

Sawa has spent his career under the umbrella of Toyota, working in engineering, research and development and design and planning before taking over at Lexus in 2016. Autocar asked him about the company’s future plans.

What do electrification and autonomous driving mean for a luxury brand like Lexus?

“For Lexus, it's another chance to be different. We can see opportunities with the technology, but the company philosophy set by president Akio Toyoda is that we will never sell commodities. We will always have ‘fun to drive’ as a core asset of our cars and we will never allow technology to lose what we are. We must never be boring. But it's also clear that electrified cars can be fun. The key will be in how you use electrification to control individual wheels. A hybrid, in particular, has potential to draw together the exciting worlds of the engine and electrification.”

Back to top

Does this present you with opportunities for radical new exterior designs?

“We already have some opportunities, largely because we only have a small model range. As a result, we can fill the gaps differently – perhaps where bigger makers have two cars spanning two segments, we will have one that sits between them. The car industry is like a constellation. If all the stars are too close, then it is hard to see the shape. If they are further apart, shining more brightly, you can see them.”

Where does that leave your relatively normal hatchback, the CT?

“It is still very successful, but the arrival of the UX has led people to ask why we have a hatch and SUV of the same size. We will watch how that market develops and then we will decide on what happens with the CT.”

And does this explain the more radical styling your cars adopt these days?

“In the past, people would say Lexus design was boring. Not now. We have learned that we have to be unique. If something has character, some will love it and some won’t. That’s fine. If you play to the established rules, you’ll always be in a pool. If you play to your own rules, you don’t have to compete.”

Read more 

Lexus LF-1 Limitless previews flagship Road Rover rival

Lexus LC review

Lexus NX review

Join our WhatsApp community and be the first to read about the latest news and reviews wowing the car world. Our community is the best, easiest and most direct place to tap into the minds of Autocar, and if you join you’ll also be treated to unique WhatsApp content. You can leave at any time after joining - check our full privacy policy here.

Join the debate

Comments
11
Add a comment…
BigMitch 13 August 2018

He is 100% right

It's hilarious to read all these armchair retards trying to tell the boss of Lexus he's wrong. He's part of the most successful Car company of all time. Anyone that thinks Toyota is behind on EV's is ignorant as hell. They just aren;t putting all their eggs in one basket. Where the hell is the infrastructure in developed markets like Australia, the US and the UK to support mass mobilisation: it  isn't there yet and it won;t be for decades! Let alone developing markets and other 2nd tier countries and nations. It makes perfect business and environmental sense to diversify the power point options.

Vertigo 13 August 2018

BigMitch wrote:

BigMitch wrote:

It's hilarious to read all these armchair retards trying to tell the boss of Lexus he's wrong. He's part of the most successful Car company of all time. Anyone that thinks Toyota is behind on EV's is ignorant as hell. They just aren;t putting all their eggs in one basket. Where the hell is the infrastructure in developed markets like Australia, the US and the UK to support mass mobilisation: it  isn't there yet and it won;t be for decades! Let alone developing markets and other 2nd tier countries and nations. It makes perfect business and environmental sense to diversify the power point options.

... Except they haven't diversified their power options. They're the only mass manufacturer without an EV either on sale or imminent.

And it shows. The Prius PHEV is a good seller, but technologically it's a generation behind the (older!) Volt. Lucky for them, GM doesn't put a lot of effort into marketing their plug-ins.

bol 13 August 2018

Bullsh*t merchant

This is the same old transparent marketing crap that Toyota has been pumping out ever since it got caught out backing the wrong horse. That it goes utterly unchallenged in the piece doesn’t reflect well. Let’s see if Lexus are pedalling the same line in five years time when Toyota has caught back up with their competitiors in EV development?

coolboy 11 August 2018

reload

These guys at Lexus/Toyota can`t find enough of druming the same box. As written, Toyota identified an early move to mass-market hybridization as a brand diferentiator when at the time, advanced turbocharged petrol and diesel engines were already fully dominated by competitors. Where could we find turbocharged petrol and diesel engines from Toyota/Lexus? ... EV environmental impact! What BS is this?Hybrid cars also have Inverters, Converters, HV compressors, Electric steering pumps, Batteries, HV harnesses... Surely, this talk about environmental impact is BS!

Know what Toyota, all those great UN Land Cruisers must still be in petrol or diesel powered for the foreseeable future, not wise consider that turmoil scenarios will be plug-friendly or populated with hydrogen refiling pumps.

So, why stick to hybrid drum against EV drum? That does not make any sense. We need both!There are customers for each of them. Let`s give voice to customers and let them to decide.Toyota is so sticky that they were in the need to pair with a Chinese automaker in order to find a way of having their first mass produced electric Toyota (rebadged). The mighty japanese brought to their knees by the "weak" chinese.

The amout of Prius drivers moving away to EVs is staggering (not). The fourth Prius generationis selling poorly worldwide, its design doesn`t help either, if not for their plug-in version, the Prius sales would have colapsed.

Battery recycling? What are you doing with your team-up with Panasonic for Prius Nimh batteries? Just cover-up to the public? Aren`t you already recicling and holding inhouse know-how?

You just need to keep churning engines on cars aren`t you, after all, the production capacity is already built. That`s why Europe now will get a Camry (as opposed to a brand new Avensis) and the Lexus CT keeps on infinite face-lifts, that, and the 2005 engineered Aygo, way to milk the production capacity...

Repeating lies, doesn`t turn them into truth, move away from it Toyota!

Ubberfrancis44 11 August 2018

coolboy wrote:

coolboy wrote:

These guys at Lexus/Toyota can`t find enough of druming the same box. As written, Toyota identified an early move to mass-market hybridization as a brand diferentiator when at the time, advanced turbocharged petrol and diesel engines were already fully dominated by competitors. Where could we find turbocharged petrol and diesel engines from Toyota/Lexus? ... EV environmental impact! What BS is this?Hybrid cars also have Inverters, Converters, HV compressors, Electric steering pumps, Batteries, HV harnesses... Surely, this talk about environmental impact is BS!

Know what Toyota, all those great UN Land Cruisers must still be in petrol or diesel powered for the foreseeable future, not wise consider that turmoil scenarios will be plug-friendly or populated with hydrogen refiling pumps.

So, why stick to hybrid drum against EV drum? That does not make any sense. We need both!There are customers for each of them. Let`s give voice to customers and let them to decide.Toyota is so sticky that they were in the need to pair with a Chinese automaker in order to find a way of having their first mass produced electric Toyota (rebadged). The mighty japanese brought to their knees by the "weak" chinese.

The amout of Prius drivers moving away to EVs is staggering (not). The fourth Prius generationis selling poorly worldwide, its design doesn`t help either, if not for their plug-in version, the Prius sales would have colapsed.

Battery recycling? What are you doing with your team-up with Panasonic for Prius Nimh batteries? Just cover-up to the public? Aren`t you already recicling and holding inhouse know-how?

You just need to keep churning engines on cars aren`t you, after all, the production capacity is already built. That`s why Europe now will get a Camry (as opposed to a brand new Avensis) and the Lexus CT keeps on infinite face-lifts, that, and the 2005 engineered Aygo, way to milk the production capacity...

Repeating lies, doesn`t turn them into truth, move away from it Toyota!

Did you actually read the article?! It clearly states there are opportunities for both technologys (engines and EV's) in the future, which if im not mistaken is what you believe in aswell, so why so mad?!