Opel and Vauxhall have not posted a full-year profit this century, losing about £15 billion in the past 17 years. That represents a catastrophic failure by any measure, but it also highlights just how ambitious the recovery plan set out by new owner the PSA Group is.
The strategy, called ‘Pace’, calls for (among other things) a 2% operating profit margin by 2020 and 6% by 2026. The latter figure is about the level the PSA Group is at today.
With the first anniversary of PSA’s takeover coming up in August, and that ambitious profit target marked as a line in the sand, the expectation is that the cost-cutting seen so far will continue, and that Opel and Vauxhall will get back on the front foot in terms of defining their goals and shaping up to launch new cars. But, as PSA CEO Carlos Tavares warns, more sales won’t mean fewer cuts: “Size does not define efficiency. And we will pull every lever we can to be efficient.”
Some aspects of the cost-cutting have been well documented, such as the 650 job losses at the Ellesmere Port plant. Insiders talk in awe at the speed of the decision-making processes compared with the days of GM ownership. “When Tavares sees a logical plan, he asks one of two questions,” said a source. “‘When can we do it?’ or ‘Why haven’t we done it?’ The hard decisions are getting made.”
So, too, have seemingly simple ones. One of the first jobs of PSA’s new management was to try to rationalise the product offerings. “Insignia buyers had 27 steering wheel options,” said Opel-Vauxhall CEO Michael Lohscheller, “but around 90% were opting for one of two designs. Yet we were buying in, storing, stock managing the others. It was so complex, so inefficient.”
Lohscheller doesn’t tell that story to criticise GM, but rather to highlight why he believes the 2% profit goal by 2020 is achievable. The savings to date are in part why the company was acknowledging, if not celebrating, that it had cut running costs by a remarkable 17% by the end of 2017, five months into the new regime. Even so, the champagne stayed on ice: accounts filed last month revealed that, during that period, Vauxhall and Opel still cost its parent company £160 million in losses.
Join the debate
Add your comment
"Vauxhall" needs to be
"Vauxhall" needs to be dropped. The brand as an asset must have a negative value on the books.
Opel needs to be launched and marketed toward a more "sophisticated" clientel.
If it takes the addition of extras above the class standard, 5 year warranties and a mountain load of marketing money then that is what should be done.
They bought Opel to get access to German speaking markets because PSA products don't sell well in those markets.
Vauxhall, great sellers
Up until being bought out they had great sales figures in the UK, Astra, Corsa Mokka and even the Insigna were in the top 10 in the UK. VXR's kept the youth happy and the mundane stuff gave the Focus and Fiesta a run for it's money, alot companies would have killed for their customer base!!
Oh SAAB sank SAAB, they were a failing company with no real assets unlike ROVER.
@ xxxx
....I dont think anyone would kill for Vauxhall's client base....mainly hire car fleet and huge pre-reg/highly discounted sales to buy top 10 rating.
Distress marketing!
Out of all my circle of friends and aquaitances, I cant think of one who has a Vauxhall of any kind.....and yet as soon as you get near to Luton, you see them everywhere. Thats because any one who knows anyone who works at the plant can get a cheap Vauxhall.
It's good to see what appears