Currently reading: New McLaren 650S supercar previewed ahead of Geneva motor show

Hotter 12C-based supercar to get public debut in March, with 641bhp on tap from its twin-turbo V8 engine

McLaren has previewed its third supercar, dubbed 650S, ahead of the Geneva motor show with a preview shot showing the model’s name badge.

The 650S will be a new production model based on the 12C, featuring extensive styling changes, including a P1-style nose, and will be engineered to have more character than the existing car. 

The ‘650’ name is thought to refer to the 650ps (641bhp) output of the tweaked twin-turbo 3.8-litre V8 engine. By comparison, the standard car gets 616bhp from the same powerplant, with a top speed of 204mph and a 0-60mph time of 3.2 seconds.

Two versions will be available, one with a ‘carbon kit’ to further distinguish the car’s looks. Sources say a 12C replacement, which will be heavily influenced by the 650S, will be shown later this year. The new model is destined to rival the Ferrari 458 Speciale, which has 597bhp on tap from its V8 engine.

Official pricing for the 650S has yet to be announced, but it's likely to cost around £20,000 more than the £176,000 12C coupé. It's expected that most buyers in the UK will opt for the new model over the standard 12C when it goes on sale.

The introduction of the 650S means McLaren's product portfolio continues to grow. As well as its current crop of models, the company is also working on an entry-level model to rival the Porsche 911, dubbed P13, and a new supercar to sit between the 12C and P1, named P15.

Read more Geneva motor show news.

Join our WhatsApp community and be the first to read about the latest news and reviews wowing the car world. Our community is the best, easiest and most direct place to tap into the minds of Autocar, and if you join you’ll also be treated to unique WhatsApp content. You can leave at any time after joining - check our full privacy policy here.

Steve Cropley

Steve Cropley Autocar
Title: Editor-in-chief

Steve Cropley is the oldest of Autocar’s editorial team, or the most experienced if you want to be polite about it. He joined over 30 years ago, and has driven many cars and interviewed many people in half a century in the business. 

Cropley, who regards himself as the magazine’s “long stop”, has seen many changes since Autocar was a print-only affair, but claims that in such a fast moving environment he has little appetite for looking back. 

He has been surprised and delighted by the generous reception afforded the My Week In Cars podcast he makes with long suffering colleague Matt Prior, and calls it the most enjoyable part of his working week.

Join the debate

Comments
7
Add a comment…
Peter Cavellini 13 February 2014

God bless.........???

All these wealthy buyers who help Road test the tech for us poor people!
IAD 13 February 2014

Whilst I agree on the styling

Whilst I agree on the styling (get rid of Frank Stephenson and bring in Donato Coco) I would hardly call their architecture basic. This car has 641bhp, does well over 200 mph, 0-60mph in around 3 secs, weighs around 1.4 tons and a full carbonfibre chassis with a ride that matches the best luxury cars out there and it's brilliant on track as well as on roads. What more can you want? Anything more you might as well get yourself a P1.
TS7 13 February 2014

Read again IAD

IAD wrote:

I would hardly call their architecture basic.

Saying 'the same basic architecture' is not the same thing as saying 'the architecture is basic'!

pychris 13 February 2014

Basic architecture

TS7 wrote:
IAD wrote:

I would hardly call their architecture basic.

Saying 'the same basic architecture' is not the same thing as saying 'the architecture is basic'!

McLaren is a small company. They're not backed by a large scale manufacturer such as VW or Fiat. They've taken a carbon tub and used it as the basis of different models. The same reason why they've kept with the 3.8 litre V6 engine.

IAD 13 February 2014

TS7 wrote:IAD wrote:I would

TS7 wrote:
IAD wrote:

I would hardly call their architecture basic.

Saying 'the same basic architecture' is not the same thing as saying 'the architecture is basic'!

My bad. I stand corrected. But what I was trying to say is they can squeeze as much from this basic architecture for the next decade and they will still be ahead of it's rivals in terms of technology used in this car. I mean the P1 uses the same basic architecture as the 12C and look what they managed to squeeze out of it? God knows what else they could produce if they continue squeezing?

concinnity 13 February 2014

Model range

I said it before, but Porsche for years had this model plan, based on one car but with variants sold as models in their own right ( Compare 911 to 959 ). Mercedes C200s and C63s are hardly in the same price range and so are hardly one model. And Harley Davidson used the same marketing approach for years quite successfully. If there are buyers, why not?