Autocar, in collaboration with Capoco Design, has redesigned London's Routemaster bus for the 21st century.
So positive has been the reaction to Associate editor Hilton Holloway's piece that we've decided to reproduce it in full below, so that all and sundry can read what all the fuss is about. We think this proposal, for a hydrogen-powered Routemaster capable of carrying up to 76 passengers, makes much more sense that London's fleet of loathed and problematic bendy-busses.
UPDATE: Read Autocar's road test of the New Bus for London
Return of the Routemaster
Although I grew up in the Britain’s premier bus town, I was never a fan of this uniquely lumbering form of transport. Aged 11, I had no choice but to take the local Fishwick bus to the secondary school – a single decker Leyland National if my memory serves – and cough up 11p each way.
Once I graduated to local sixth form, the local authority gave me the option of either a bus or rail pass. No contest. Let the train take the strain. Five minutes, non-stop to Preston. The same bus journey would have been a neck-snapping 45-minute drag.
It wasn’t until I shipped up in London 10 years later, that I found myself standing at the bus stop again. As a lowly junior news reporter, driving shiny new press cars was out of the question. So it was the No 137 Routemaster for me, the original Clapham omnibus. Queenstown Road Battersea to Sloane Square tube station in Chelsea.
By then, I also had six years studying product design under my belt, so was well placed to appreciate the superbly thought-out Routemaster design. It was designed specifically for use in London and took into account the unique nature of the capital’s roads.
It was light (based around an aluminium space frame), narrow, fuel efficient (more so than today’s buses), relatively agile and – most importantly – allowed passengers to jump on and off whenever it was at a standstill. And sometimes when it wasn’t…
This last feature wasn’t unique - Leyland buses of 1920s vintage had rear platforms – but it did mean that it was ideal for London travel, where quick changes between bus routes, tubes and even taxis, is often the norm.
Sure, the Routemaster was a bit cramped. Pushchairs needed to be folded and it was a no-go for wheelchairs, but it did serve 95 percent of the commuting public better than any bus ever seen in the capital.
The detailing was a delight. Not just the post-war aluminium aesthetic (it looked a little like it had been built using parts from a scrapped Lancaster bomber), but also the superb interior. The hardwood decked floors, beautiful wind-down windows activated by beautifully engineered handles.
Some versions had bare lightbulbs mounted above the windows. At night there was nothing to touch the subdued ambience of a Routemaster. (What a contrast to sitting in a brash modern bus under the harsh strip lights).
Join the debate
Add your comment
Re: Autocar re-invents the Routemaster
Good idea! The Routemaster is a design icon that London is known for all over the world. Capoco Design has done a good job with a classic design/form language combined with new technology.
Remember the square boxy London taxis? Nobody wanted them! - just as (Ken's) bendy busses. Perhaps some details can discussed in the proposed design, but the direction is definitely right in my opinion.
Indeed a "completely" new modern design might work also - but it could also end up as something that just doesn't feel right. Trends do change. A "modern" design of today might not be a pride in 15..20 years. A retro design is therefore more likely to withstand changes in trends and design language. Unless, someone manages to make new design icon with a timeless modern look.. It's not easy, but both new Jaguars and Aston Martins (in particular!) show design icons can still be created in UK.
Great that Boris has given the idea his backing.
Someone suggested trolley busses - just keep in mind it might be quite costly to place the wires along the routes - and the wires would not be a visually pleasing solution.
It is easier to build new buses that can be placed in on any old or new route than creating a trolley infrastructure - and we do not want to pay for another MetroNet do we? ; )
Alan Ponsford has done a good job. Ok, perhaps refinement of some of the details and Londoners could be proud of the tfl buses again!
When Boris, allow motorcycles and scooters in the bus lanes with new Routemasters London will be a nicer place.
Re: Autocar re-invents the Routemaster
Re: Autocar re-invents the Routemaster
I agree with Michael Knight. The “bulbous” nose needs to go while somehow the iconic look retained. More work, but well worth it.
Interesting thinking re: the drive train process. “Silent running” deep in the heart of an urban area opens up all sorts of environmental enhancement options.
Operationally, though, in order to be commercially successful (thus useful) the design needs tweaking, imho. The current one-way traffic flow in one door and out the other of the Dennis Enviros, et al, generally allows faster loading/unloading. This is a tremendous benefit, and the design offered throws that advantage away.
My suggestion (though admittedly costly) would be a curb-side (OK, kerb) front door, second stairwell (behind the driver) and an Oyster-card reader with CCTV oversight at the rear-door. Use pattern would be front loading, rear exiting, with rear-loading permitted once that platform cleared. Rear-boarders would scan their own cards. Misreads or skips could be asked by a generic message over the PA to “re-scan” at alternate reader stations while the coach was still in motion, saving time and hurt feelings. {Can anybody say, “Man the gap!)”?
Not said critically, but culturally UK transport operations are not as up-to-speed as North American vis-a-vis disabled passengers. Sorry, guys, but I've been there and suffered through it first hand. With that view in mind, I think two designated wheelchair stations is great, but there's no reason those same stations (and maybe two more to accommodate probable cultural changes over the next decades) shouldn't be made convertible (by using a similar appearing but easily foldable against the wall seat assembly) so as to not lose seating capacity from the additional stairwell. This style has been available overseas for almost three decades.
I've operated transit systems in Yosemite Valley and Pebble Beach, and can see the international appeal of this proposal to many urban area transit authorities. The design process should also allow for left-hand drive “flip-flopping” of the coach body during manufacture to facilitate it's commercial acceptance world-wide. If done properly, and when they set their mind to it Londoners are quite capable of “doing things up right”, the RXML could be the next iconic image Brits use to their advantage for another half century or so. Cheers from the Monterey Bay.