Currently reading: Fast 4x4 shootout - who's best?

BMW v Porsche v Range Rover v Infiniti

The Porsche Cayenne Turbo has long been the king of the fast 4x4 club, but that position has come under threat recently.

To find out if it's still the best, autocar.co.uk pitted it against the 547bhp BMW X6 M, 503bhp Range Rover Sport Supercharged and 385bhp Infiniti FX50S.

Video - BMW v Porsche v Range Rover v Infiniti - 4x4 showdown

See the BMW v Porsche v Range Rover v Infiniti - 4x4 showdown pictures

On track

Tested at the Bruntingthorpe airfield circuit, its remarkable how little body lean there is as you commit the Porsche to a corner, and how much speed it can carry in the wet conditions. As grip runs out, so it gradually understeers.

But you have to drive incredibly quickly to encounter that dynamic safety net. Most of the time it just turns, grips and goes harder than a lot of so-called performance cars weighing a full tonne less.

In relative terms the Sport feels quite slow and out of its depth on a circuit. Its handling is perfectly predictable and very nicely resolved, but the car pitches and rolls much more than any of the other cars on test here.

The Infiniti is also bested by the Porsche, but by a much smaller margin. It feels at home on the circuit, with quick and feelsome steering, taut damping and a balanced chassis. If it weren't giving up so much power to the Cayenne, it'd probably be quicker than it.

But it's the BMW X6 M that comes out on top. After the other three, the X6 M might as well be an Audi R8. It's twice as agile and sufficiently composed to be driven quicker through corners even than the Porsche.

In the wet, on a circuit, there's no doubt that the X6 M handles like a proper M car.

On road

Out on the road the BMW's refinement impresses, too. Despite its dynamic focus on track, there's little harshness in the car's ride and, like all modern M cars, you can detune throttle response if you want to. All in all, it's a pleasant thing to stroke along at seven or eight-tenths - but it rarely takes your breath away.

The Cayenne suffers in comparison. In Normal and Comfort modes the same delayed reactions to steering and throttle inputs present themselves, as they did on track. And yet Sport mode makes the car's B-road performance worse.

By contrast, the Range Rover's chassis feels superbly judged; it reeks of extensive spring and damper tuning. The car feels just firm enough to be hustled along with a bit of verve, and its commanding driving position, incisive steering and newly refreshed cabin allow you to take a lot of pleasure in driving it.

Yet it is the FX50S that stuns you. It handles, rides and steers like a Nissan 370Z. It feels connected to the road, and more like a sports car, more of the time, than any of the other cars.

Advertisement

Read our review

Car review

The Infiniti FX is an interesting alternative to the norm, but lacks space and comfort to compete in this class

Back to top

It's fast - as fast as any car this size needs to be - and it costs £24,000 less than the BMW, £22,000 less than the Porsche and £8000 less than the Range Rover.

Verdict

Whether the money matters in this segment isn't relevant, though. The little-known Infiniti is the most sporting SUV on the market.

The full test report is in this week's Autocar magazine, on sale now.

Twitter - follow autocar.co.ukSee all the latest Infiniti reviews, news and video

Join the debate

Comments
24
Add a comment…
Dan McNeil v2 9 January 2010

Re: Fast 4x4 showdown - who's best?

tannedbaldhead wrote:

Dan McNeil v2 wrote:
beaten up Defender pick-up. Full of dents. Faded paintwork. Cockpit full of empty crisp packets and stale mugs of coffee.

With the exception of mine being a hardtop and not being Zulufied you have described my wheels for this week perfectly.

Ha! Get it Zulu'd, give it a week of scaring collies and and upwardly mobile types in overpriced and bouncy Teutonic blandmobiles at the traffic lights, and then post a report here.

PS. Possibly ditch the straw bales to give yourself that extra tenth of a second advantage.

tannedbaldhead 9 January 2010

Re: Fast 4x4 showdown - who's best?

Dan McNeil v2 wrote:
beaten up Defender pick-up. Full of dents. Faded paintwork. Cockpit full of empty crisp packets and stale mugs of coffee.

With the exception of mine being a hardtop and not being Zulufied you have described my wheels for this week perfectly.

Dan McNeil v2 9 January 2010

Re: Fast 4x4 showdown - who's best?

John McToon wrote:
These are wicked. Truly wicked. £35k plus the donor car though so they aint cheap. I attended the Fastest Land Rover event at Bruntingthorpe recently (did I mention that I'm in to Land Rovers?) and they had an SVX Zulu there (the special 60th anniversary convertible model converted) and it did a standing 1/4 in 16.8 seconds! And it had a problem revving to the max that day too!
I have to say I like this. The ultimate would be to have JE convert a beaten up Defender pick-up. Full of dents. Faded paintwork. Cockpit full of empty crisp packets and stale mugs of coffee. A couple of straw bales and a collie in the back. You can see the traffic light scene already...oh yes, the collie would be somewhat perturbed. In this guise, possibly the ultimate Q-car.