Currently reading: Citroen C4 and C4 Cactus to merge into one model

The quirky C4 Cactus and more conventional C4 will be streamlined into one model line for the next-generation model in 2021

The Citroën C4 Cactus and Citroen C4 will merge into one model with for the next-generation car, due in 2021, as the French car maker seeks to streamline its product line-up.

While the crossover-styled C4 Cactus has just received a facelift, production of the more conventional C4 saloon has stopped and Citroën's product boss Xavier Peugeot said its replacement would incorporate the C4 Cactus. That means Citroën will only have one model in the family hatchback C-segment, which includes rivals such as the Peugeot 308, Ford Focus and Volkswagen Golf.

Citroën C4 Cactus review

Peugeot said: "We needed to reduce our line-up to eight silhouettes [as demanded by Citroën’s parent company PSA’s boss Carlos Tavares], so one of these models had to go. The C4 and C4 Cactus are converging into one.”

Asked why the C4 Cactus had won out over the C4, he said: “It is more in line with Citroën positioning. We want to position ourselves differently [to other brands] and the C4 Cactus is the stronger basis to do it.”

Since going on sale in 2014, the C4 Cactus has outsold the C4 in Europe.

Peugeot said the development of the replacement model had already started. Whether the car keeps the 'Cactus' name or reverts to simply 'C4' depends on the success of the updated C4 Cactus model. “If this car is a strong success, the name Cactus could become iconic,” Peugeot said, suggesting it would then make sense to keep the name for future generations.

He did not yet know whether the next-generation C4/C4 Cactus would keep the slightly higher, quasi-SUV styling of the current C4 Cactus. However he acknowledged that the updated model had purposefully been made to look less SUV-like: “We needed to remove some of the SUV markers on it because it became too much like the C3 Aircross. We wanted to tone down the SUV elements and make it more like a hatchback, but our research shows buyers interested in crossovers are also interested in this car, too."

Peugeot also expressed his desire to keep making cars which polarise buyers to achieve the car maker’s goal to be different to its rivals. He believed the original C4 Cactus was polarising and expected the facelifted version to do the same: “I believe this car will continue to polarise, though a little bit less than the last. I like this because I believe Citroën should challenge the norm. There should be a little more level of dislike compared to a normal car.”

Read more

Citroën C4 Cactus review

Citroën C3 Aircross review

Citroën boss: fleet buyers could sway diesel's future

Advertisement

Read our review

Car review

Gallic quirkiness meets pragmatism in Ciroen's distinctive crossover hatchback, but there's strong competition from the Volkswagen group

Back to top

 

Join the debate

Comments
10
Add a comment…
johnhg 13 February 2018

CITROEN C4/CACTUS

Isn't there quite a lot of (cheaper) C3 in the Cactus?

si73 13 February 2018

While the c4 may not be

While the c4 may not be particularly great I still don't like the fact suvs are replacing ordinary cars completely, surely the job is to make the c4 worth having as vw successfully do with the golf etc.

xxxx 13 February 2018

THB(tall hatch backs) v Hatchback

Problem is not all companies are big enough to fight on all fronts. Best make one good car than two below average ones, especially if your parent company makes a perfectly good hatch.

xxxx 13 February 2018

C4

I don't think the C4 will be the last model gone but not replaced over the next year.

concinnity you're soright about the lack of proper rear windows, it must be a citroen thing because in the DS4 they don't open at all! 

si73 13 February 2018

The up and its clones rear

The up and its clones rear windows dont wind even on 5door variants, its lazy design as it could easily be done. Strange though how it is the accepted norm with 3 doors when it is still possible to have the mechanism behind the inner trim.

typos1 13 February 2018

It not laziness, its cost

It not laziness, its cost cutting.