Forget the furore. Remove from your mind, if you can, the past two weeks’ noise about Living Vivid and Breaking Moulds.
Concentrate instead on the Jaguar Type 00 (Zero Zero), the long-promised concept coupé that introduces an entirely new design style to the 90-year-old marque and sets the tone for its all-EV range that will hit showrooms from 2026.
The concept car is a two-door fixed-head coupé, a body type we’re told will not be built. But it has perhaps been artfully chosen because it loosely echoes the layout of the 1961 Jaguar E-Type, the car nearly everyone cites as the leader of a previous great leap forward in Jaguar design.
Company insiders say the concept coupé’s size, proportions and, above all, its design style are all “very close” to the brand’s first next-generation production car: a blocky Porsche Taycan-rivalling super-GT that was pictured testing earlier this month. That car and its radical styling were first revealed by Autocar back in 2023, and the Type 00 concept shows how accurate our sources were.
This will be the first of three models to be launched within about a year between them on the new purpose-designed JEA architecture. That platform will, Jaguar estimates, offer as much as 430 miles of range and the ability to add 200 miles with 15 minutes of charge. This would suggest power being drawn from a battery in excess of 100kWh, but Jaguar has yet to confirm a pack size.
Join the debate
Add your comment
Jaguar have cocked up badly with their focus on £100k+ cars. This is the wrong way to go.
What Jaguar need to do is perhaps share platforms with Vauxhall for some cars, perhaps a version of the new 2025 Vauxhall Insignia crossover on Stellantis's STLA medium platform. Perhaps this is the chance to revive the Jaguar XE or X-Type name. However, the platform only supports electric motors up to 443bhp.
But, no, it's not a rebadged Vauxhall - it'd be different-looking.
I could see this selling for about £8.5k more than the Insignia, but it'd work. So maybe it'd start around £39,000 and go up to £50,000 for the sportiest model.
This is a bit of a low point for Jaguar.
Wasn't the brand egalitarian in the Seventies and Eighties?
I'm probably being stupid but if the car has no rear view mirrors or back window but relies on cameras that jump out of little external cupboards how does that work? So I understand taking side mirrors off for aesthetic and aerodynamic reasons but looking at the pics the result will be even less aerodynamic than a mirror. So just following that logic does that mean that the driver is "blind" unless he chooses to extend the camera? Whcih would be a ludicrous outcome. As above I may be being a moron but would welcome any insights. Just to be clear I will never buy a car without a rear window.I'm a very experienced and skilled driver and I'm constantly checking all three mirrors to make sure I understand where all the chess pieces are and where they are going to.
That wouldn't be road legal, this is just show car fantasy. The production car must have mirrors or cameras deployed while driving - I hope it's the former, although maybe camera tech will keep improving.
There's a claimed aero benefit to cameras, but in the real world this must be tiny. It's mostly a designer obsession. To be fair, the back seat of a Polestar 4 feels fine without a rear window, but as with the long bonnet I'd like it to serve some purpose and not just be an aesthetic decision.
Personally I felt a bit enclosed in the Polestar 4 and would prefer a rear window. Main issue with Cameras is they can't convey the depth in the way a mirror does. Seems odd they they've got a metal panel in the shape of a window on this, whereas with Polestar 4 there isn't space for one, so makes more sense there.
There are literally millions of vans and trucks on our roads with no rear window, your obviously not that experience or skilled if youve never driven one. Then of course there are people who tow trailers and caravans with no view out of the rear window, so I suppose you will never tow anything either, just how experienced and skilled are you?
For those saying Jaguar sales were poor remember they were winding Jaguar down. Stoping production of model after model.
Even during the pandemic and for the semiconductor shortage they didn't build Jaguars, concentrating on Land Rover instead.
They needed to to justify what they just did to Jaguar - Killing it off.
But they should have instead built a One-Series or A-Class rival, a true M / AMG competitor. Then they'd be more of a 1:1 comparison to their German rivals, and it would stop ill informed journalists complaining they weren't selling as many when they never building building comparable range of models.
this is all so obviously uninformed nonsense. JLR are a small company. The LR side has been a massive success, Jaguar has not, so of course they focussed on building the cars that were selling.
why would they deliberately kill Jaguar?
I'm what way would a 1 series equivalent have worked where the 7, 5 and 3 series equivalents haven't, at least not well enough.
I, like everyone else, don't know if this rebrand will work. At least they're trying something rather than repeating past failures yet again.
So are you saying during the years and the billions of pounds they spent developing the XE-XF-FPace-FType and the iPace, it was just so they could wind Jaguar down to kill it off.
Or in fact were sales poor because the products where?
Jaguar couldnt sell saloons, even though, BMW,Mercedes and Audi didnt have a problem, they couldnt sell SUVs even though every one else could, they couldnt sell a sports coupe even though Porsche, Mercedes, Audi, BMW, Toyota, Mazda, didnt have any problems, they produced an EV, then sort of forgot to develop it or expand the range.
Now we have the f***ing Pink Panther mobile and an image thats sinking faster than the Titanic, whilst management rearrange the deckchairs and refuse to acknowledge the iceberg.
Look at when Thierry Bollore came in and how after that point they started winding down Jaguar. At the same time as the semiconductor shortage, which gave them an excuse to build fewer whilst redirecting chips to Land Rover.
Before the pandemic I went looking for a Jaguar. The sales guy said I hope it's not the F-Pace you're asking for as we can't get them. It was a success for Jaguar.
But it wasn't all perfect. I didn't buy because they were still using Ford engines at the time. I don't have a problem with buying a Ford with a Ford engine, but at this level it's not good enough. I wanted more power for the amount of fuel they used. Or more efficiency.
If you had been following what Jaguar are doing with their "Reimagining" plan you'll know that Bollore dropped the next XJ just as it was going into production. You'll know they stopped all the development of new Jaguars, and about 6 were in development (from Callum). Bollore chased out Thomson, a highly talented designer responsible for the Elise and LRX concept that McGovern uses as the basis of all Range Rovers that came afterwards (copy?).
After the pandemic they simply wouldn't run production of some models which then customers would walk away to find something they could buy instead. Even when you could order them, they stripped back all the options.
And you'll also know how systematically Jaguar stopped production of each model up to now where they are the "Producers of Nothing".