Currently reading: Fresh pictures: Jaguar enters new age with radical Type 00 Concept

New concept sets out the radical look destined for its £120k-plus, new-era EVs

Forget the furore. Remove from your mind, if you can, the past two weeks’ noise about Living Vivid and Breaking Moulds.

Concentrate instead on the Jaguar Type 00 (Zero Zero), the long-promised concept coupé that introduces an entirely new design style to the 90-year-old marque and sets the tone for its all-EV range that will hit showrooms from 2026.

Advertisement

The concept car is a two-door fixed-head coupé, a body type we’re told will not be built. But it has perhaps been artfully chosen because it loosely echoes the layout of the 1961 Jaguar E-Type, the car nearly everyone cites as the leader of a previous great leap forward in Jaguar design.

Company insiders say the concept coupé’s size, proportions and, above all, its design style are all “very close” to the brand’s first next-generation production car: a blocky Porsche Taycan-rivalling super-GT that was pictured testing earlier this month. That car and its radical styling were first revealed by Autocar back in 2023, and the Type 00 concept shows how accurate our sources were.

This will be the first of three models to be launched within about a year between them on the new purpose-designed JEA architecture. That platform will, Jaguar estimates, offer as much as 430 miles of range and the ability to add 200 miles with 15 minutes of charge. This would suggest power being drawn from a battery in excess of 100kWh, but Jaguar has yet to confirm a pack size.

Back to top

This concept, revealed on 2 December at Miami Art Week, is the product of an exhaustive process that led designers to produce 13 full-size models on the way, and its maturity shows. All were avant-garde, according to design chief Gerry McGovern. “Anything iterative would not have taken us where we wanted to go,” he said.

Jaguar Type 00 – side

Its name, which reprises the word ‘Type’ used for so many great Jaguars, also suggests that future nomenclature won’t stray too far from the past.

Although the Type 00 is a two-door car with forward-hinged dihedral doors and built on a shorter-than-production wheelbase, it tells us plenty about the forthcoming saloon. We already know this is a low, lithe car in the old Jaguar mould, with a raked roof, a long wheelbase and a uniquely long bonnet.

It’s also one of a new wave of cars that ditches a heavy and fundamentally useless rear window and uses twin side cameras, and a digital rear-view mirror like that offered in its Defender cousin.

Back to top

The Type 00’s shape is defined by long, confident lines that spell out beautiful, opulent proportions, according to its maker. The modernist surfaces are starkly simple, almost flat in places, but they incorporate sleek compound curves where needed.

The overall effect is boldness – a key aim of the designers – yet the surfacing and sparse details carry impressions of sophistication and restraint, as befits a Jaguar selling in the £120,000 bracket, more than twice the price of an outgoing-generation Jag.

Jaguar Type 00 – rear quarter

The glasshouse stresses the theme of lowness. The Type 00 has a fairly high waist and a flattish roof with a ‘fast’ rear panel (without window) that gives it almost a chop-top look. In that one way, it faintly resembles one previous Jaguar: the XJS.

The car has a bluff front with no ‘proper’ grille, using Jaguar’s new 16-bar Strike Through design device as frontal embellishment. The same device is used again atop the long bonnet and it even flows through the raked windscreen to become a fascia-topped feature. The massive 23in alloys also use the same multi-line Strike Through as part of their own design.

Back to top

Inside, it is a stunning, cream-coloured compartment for two that shuns leather in favour ofmodern, sustainable textiles such as Kvadrat (already popular in production Defenders and Range Rovers). It features a pair of elegantly designed bucket seats, constructed in a way that avoids visible stitching (as in the Defender Octa). There’s also a surface called Travertine Stone on the centre console (a genuine stone veneer) and a brass spine runs along the length of the cabin.

The concept’s controls and instruments are comprehensive, rethought but minimised in what has become a very JLR way. “Just as on the outside, deployable technologies are a hallmark of the interior,” said interior design chief Tom Holden.

Jaguar Type 00 – door open

This is shown by two rearview screens (“that glide silently and theatrically”), which save the Type 00 from having untidy exterior rear-vision mirrors. The door releases are in the roof console next to a long panoramic roof. And instead of choosing your driving mode from a switch, you drop a brass token into a slot in the centre console.

Back to top

Some of it is beautiful, some features are gimmicky and, unlike with the exterior, it’s far from clear how influential the Type 00’s cabin will be on the 2026 production car.

Overwhelmingly, the Type 00 fulfils its mission to be “a copy of nothing”, to employ once again that grievously overused quote from Jaguar founder Sir William Lyons. It also brings a new logic to the much-discussed rebranding elements: the Device Mark, the Strike Through, the Maker’s Mark (the new ‘leaper’ and simpler ‘JR’ medallion).

The new ‘jaGuar’ script looks okay on the car, despite its middle capital letter, and the Strike Through provides interesting detail for the car’s frontal surface – where traditionally a grille would be – while also giving the rear body panel an unmistakable ‘new Jaguar’ identity. The new brass leaper provides detail on each of the car’s front flanks and the ‘JR’ medallions are used as wheel centres. It all comes together far better than many critics might have imagined a few weeks ago.

Jaguar Type 00 – wheel logo

Back to top

In most ways, the Type 00’s design collides head on with the proportions of the outgoing I-Pace, Jaguar’s first full EV that was launched only six years ago and whose creators took pains to emphasise their car’s forward-control layout (and consequent short nose) and to brand it an SUV. This allowed it a sleek but high-riding shape with plenty of space for the battery below the cabin floor. We have yet to discover how the new-generation Jaguars will accommodate their batteries while retaining their low-slung stance.

The lowness of the Type 00 and the similarly low-riding production models to come promise a relatively small frontal area (despite a very upright, bluff front) as a way of delivering decent aerodynamic performance.

But good aero is not the only priority, it seems. Jaguar managing director Rawdon Glover said it was a key objective from the project’s earliest days to resist – for concept and production models – the arch-conventional, somewhat hackneyed use of high-riding, forward-control shapes that had “spent too long in the wind tunnel” and been adopted by many current EVs as a way of delivering Jaguar’s avowed “fearless creativity” of design.

Though everyone at JLR takes pains to credit the whole 600-strong JLR design group for work on this project, the influence of McGovern, JLR’s chief creative officer whose success with highly profitable Range Rover models has underpinned the four-year-old Reimagine plan, is clear. The idea to “think Range Rover” at Jaguar has driven the adoption of its reductive, modernist approach to the new cars.

Back to top

Jaguar Type 00 – side panel open

While promoting something “very different”, McGovern sympathises with the plight of his design predecessors at Jaguar, pointing out that the company’s product objectives 10 years ago simply wouldn’t have allowed this bold approach. “Back then, the company thought very differently,” he said, “and was aiming at very different competitors.”

The target was to grab sales from BMW and Audi with good but mainstream premium models like the XE and XF saloons and the E-Pace and F-Pace SUVs. In the past months, all of those cars, as well as the I-Pace have been ditched.

Understandably, none of Jaguar’s bigwigs wants to get into a discussion about the size of the risk they’re taking with Jaguar, though most admit there is one. JLR CEO Adrian Mardell takes a determined tone by insisting that “there will be no success for JLR without Jaguar”. That’s probably just in case any of us thought JLR people could have a happier life at Gaydon by shutting Jaguar, selling the name to the Chinese and concentrating on making super-successful Range Rovers for a living.

Back to top

While the reinvention risks alienating some of Jaguar’s traditional customers, the firm seems determined it will win over a new clientele of car lovers with £120,000 to spend. With its completely new products, this Gaydon team wants to live up to Enzo Ferrari’s age-old quote about their predecessors’ E-Type being the most beautiful car in the world.

Jaguar Type 00 – front close

Glover, who has spent a year telling people how excited he is by the size of the challenge ahead, cites copious research to back his view of the people who will buy a new-gen Jaguar.

“First and foremost,” he said, “they’ll be independently minded. They’ll have an appreciation of design and will be looking for exclusivity. We expect them to be young and wealthy, connected and more likely to live urban lives. They’ll be cash rich and time poor, so every aspect of their journey with us will need to be effortless.”

In the light of today’s EV slowdown, does he have fears for Jaguar’s acceptance? Not really, it seems. It’s all a matter of timing. Jaguar is talking about models that will be in their prime in 2030, he explains, not 2024.

Back to top

“Besides, our product will be game-changing,” he said. “Up to 430 miles of range, and in excess of 200 miles of charge possible in 15 minutes. That makes it fundamentally different from what’s on the market today.”

The first three new-era Jaguars

Autocar Jaguar line-up renders

Jaguar’s next-generation line-up will be spearheaded by a Porsche Taycan-rivalling super-GT, the design of which has been clearly previewed by the Type 00 concept.

Arriving in 2026 as the first all-new Jaguar since 2018’s I-Pace, the EV was shown in official testing images released last month to bear a striking resemblance to the concept, especially its long bonnet, low nose and square proportions. Differences with the production car come in the form of an extra set of doors and rear seats.

Although the GT’s back end has yet to be seen, the concept’s lack of a rear window indicates this will make it into production. This striking four-door GT is the first of three upcoming electric cars due to arrive by the end of the decade atop a new brand-specific, EV-only platform called JEA. The other two are thought to be a Bentley Bentayga-style SUV and a luxury saloon to rival the Mercedes S-Class.

Back to top

Opinion: What Jaguar's electric super-GT needs to be

Jaguar GT prototype testing – front quarter tracking

I’m intrigued to see the Type 00’s design translated to the upcoming electric GT. Official images of a prototype (above) show a long bonnet, long wheelbase, ‘fast’ windscreen angle, two side doors and a tapering, muscular rear end. So a more ‘trad’-looking GT car alternative to the Porsche Taycan but clearly also a deeply progressive one. 

That’s the right kind of start for an electric Jaguar GT. For £120k, it also needs to push EV norms in the technical requirements: range, charging speed, performance, weight etc. If this is Jaguar’s new world, the car absolutely must come without caveat and exhibit world-class engineering.

After that? Be beautiful. Be daring. Be a little luxurious. But most of all, be exciting – in an authentic sense, not an affected, synthesised one.

To be a truly game-changing EV, it has to put its driver in touch with the dynamic potential of electric motors like nothing else. ‘Fast’ won’t be enough: Jaguar must focus on next-level driver engagement.

Matt Saunders

Steve Cropley

Steve Cropley Autocar
Title: Editor-in-chief

Steve Cropley is the oldest of Autocar’s editorial team, or the most experienced if you want to be polite about it. He joined over 30 years ago, and has driven many cars and interviewed many people in half a century in the business. 

Cropley, who regards himself as the magazine’s “long stop”, has seen many changes since Autocar was a print-only affair, but claims that in such a fast moving environment he has little appetite for looking back. 

He has been surprised and delighted by the generous reception afforded the My Week In Cars podcast he makes with long suffering colleague Matt Prior, and calls it the most enjoyable part of his working week.

Join the debate

Comments
56
Add a comment…
vegasr686kw 4 December 2024

Jaguar have cocked up badly with their focus on £100k+ cars. This is the wrong way to go.

What Jaguar need to do is perhaps share platforms with Vauxhall for some cars, perhaps a version of the new 2025 Vauxhall Insignia crossover on Stellantis's STLA medium platform. Perhaps this is the chance to revive the Jaguar XE or X-Type name. However, the platform only supports electric motors up to 443bhp.

But, no, it's not a rebadged Vauxhall - it'd be different-looking.

I could see this selling for about £8.5k more than the Insignia, but it'd work. So maybe it'd start around £39,000 and go up to £50,000 for the sportiest model.

This is a bit of a low point for Jaguar.

Wasn't the brand egalitarian in the Seventies and Eighties?

johnfaganwilliams 4 December 2024

I'm probably being stupid but if the car has no rear view mirrors or back window but relies on cameras that jump out of little external cupboards how does that work? So I understand taking side mirrors off for aesthetic and aerodynamic reasons but looking at the pics the result will be even less aerodynamic than a mirror. So just following that logic does that mean that the driver is "blind" unless he chooses to extend the camera? Whcih would be a ludicrous outcome. As above I may be being a moron but would welcome any insights. Just to be clear I will never buy a car without a rear window.I'm a very experienced and skilled driver and I'm constantly checking all three mirrors to make sure I understand where all the chess pieces are and where they are going to.

scrap 4 December 2024

That wouldn't be road legal, this is just show car fantasy. The production car must have mirrors or cameras deployed while driving - I hope it's the former, although maybe camera tech will keep improving.

There's a claimed aero benefit to cameras, but in the real world this must be tiny. It's mostly a designer obsession. To be fair, the back seat of a Polestar 4 feels fine without a rear window, but as with the long bonnet I'd like it to serve some purpose and not just be an aesthetic decision. 

00se7en 4 December 2024

Personally I felt a bit enclosed in the Polestar 4 and would prefer a rear window.  Main issue with Cameras is they can't convey the depth in the way a mirror does.  Seems odd they they've got a metal panel in the shape of a window on this, whereas with Polestar 4 there isn't space for one, so makes more sense there.

Citytiger 4 December 2024
johnfaganwilliams wrote:

Just to be clear I will never buy a car without a rear window.I'm a very experienced and skilled driver and I'm constantly checking all three mirrors to make sure I understand where all the chess pieces are and where they are going to.

There are literally millions of vans and trucks on our roads with no rear window, your obviously not that experience or skilled if youve never driven one. Then of course there are people who tow trailers and caravans with no view out of the rear window, so I suppose you will never tow anything either, just how experienced and skilled are you?  

Symanski 4 December 2024

For those saying Jaguar sales were poor remember they were winding Jaguar down.   Stoping production of model after model. 

 

Even during the pandemic and for the semiconductor shortage they didn't build Jaguars, concentrating on Land Rover instead.

 

They needed to to justify what they just did to Jaguar - Killing it off.

 

But they should have instead built a One-Series or A-Class rival, a true M / AMG competitor.   Then they'd be more of a 1:1 comparison to their German rivals, and it would stop ill informed journalists complaining they weren't selling as many when they never building building comparable range of models.

 

Bob Cat Brian 4 December 2024
Symanski wrote:

For those saying Jaguar sales were poor remember they were winding Jaguar down.   Stoping production of model after model. 

 

Even during the pandemic and for the semiconductor shortage they didn't build Jaguars, concentrating on Land Rover instead.

 

They needed to to justify what they just did to Jaguar - Killing it off.

 

But they should have instead built a One-Series or A-Class rival, a true M / AMG competitor.   Then they'd be more of a 1:1 comparison to their German rivals, and it would stop ill informed journalists complaining they weren't selling as many when they never building building comparable range of models.

this is all so obviously uninformed nonsense. JLR are a small company. The LR side has been a massive success, Jaguar has not, so of course they focussed on building the cars that were selling.

why would they deliberately kill Jaguar?

I'm what way would a 1 series equivalent have worked where the 7, 5 and 3 series equivalents haven't, at least not well enough.  

I, like everyone else, don't know if this rebrand will work. At least they're trying something rather than repeating past failures yet again. 

Citytiger 4 December 2024
Symanski wrote:

For those saying Jaguar sales were poor remember they were winding Jaguar down.   Stoping production of model after model. 

 

Even during the pandemic and for the semiconductor shortage they didn't build Jaguars, concentrating on Land Rover instead.

 

They needed to to justify what they just did to Jaguar - Killing it off.

 

But they should have instead built a One-Series or A-Class rival, a true M / AMG competitor.   Then they'd be more of a 1:1 comparison to their German rivals, and it would stop ill informed journalists complaining they weren't selling as many when they never building building comparable range of models.

 

So are you saying during the years and the billions of pounds they spent developing the XE-XF-FPace-FType and the iPace, it was just so they could wind Jaguar down to kill it off.  

Or in fact were sales poor because the products where?

Jaguar couldnt sell saloons, even though, BMW,Mercedes and Audi didnt have a problem, they couldnt sell SUVs even though every one else could, they couldnt sell a sports coupe even though Porsche, Mercedes, Audi, BMW, Toyota, Mazda, didnt have any problems, they produced an EV, then sort of forgot to develop it or expand the range.

Now we have the f***ing Pink Panther mobile and an image thats sinking faster than the Titanic, whilst management rearrange the deckchairs and refuse to acknowledge the iceberg.

 

Symanski 4 December 2024
Citytiger wrote:

So are you saying during the years and the billions of pounds they spent developing the XE-XF-FPace-FType and the iPace, it was just so they could wind Jaguar down to kill it off.  

Jaguar couldnt sell saloons, even though, BMW,Mercedes and Audi didnt have a problem, they couldnt sell SUVs even though every one else could, they couldnt sell a sports coupe even though Porsche, Mercedes, Audi, BMW, Toyota, Mazda, didnt have any problems, they produced an EV, then sort of forgot to develop it or expand the range.

Look at when Thierry Bollore came in and how after that point they started winding down Jaguar.   At the same time as the semiconductor shortage, which gave them an excuse to build fewer whilst redirecting chips to Land Rover.

 

Before the pandemic I went looking for a Jaguar.   The sales guy said I hope it's not the F-Pace you're asking for as we can't get them.   It was a success for Jaguar.

 

But it wasn't all perfect.   I didn't buy because they were still using Ford engines at the time.   I don't have a problem with buying a Ford with a Ford engine, but at this level it's not good enough.   I wanted more power for the amount of fuel they used.   Or more efficiency.

 

If you had been following what Jaguar are doing with their "Reimagining" plan you'll know that Bollore dropped the next XJ just as it was going into production.   You'll know they stopped all the development of new Jaguars, and about 6 were in development (from Callum).   Bollore chased out Thomson, a highly talented designer responsible for the Elise and LRX concept that McGovern uses as the basis of all Range Rovers that came afterwards (copy?).

 

After the pandemic they simply wouldn't run production of some models which then customers would walk away to find something they could buy instead.   Even when you could order them, they stripped back all the options.

 

 And you'll also know how systematically Jaguar stopped production of each model up to now where they are the "Producers of Nothing".