Currently reading: New York motor show 2012: Mazda Takeri

Japanese company shows off its vision for the future of efficient combustion engines in New York

The Mazda Takeri saloon concept previously seen at the Tokyo and Geneva motor shows has been unveiled in front of the US audience at today's New York motor show.

As car companies embark on wildly contrasting electric and hybrid vehicle strategies, could some of the most revolutionary advances come from the trusty combustion engine? Mazda is determined to prove there’s life left in petrol and diesel.

The Takeri concept exists as a showcase for Mazda’s ‘Kodo – Soul in Motion’ design language, which is guiding the direction of the firm’s latest production cars. According to Mazda Europe’s design chief, Peter Birtwhistle, “about 80 per cent” of the Takeri will be carried over onto the next 6 saloon, due next year.

The Takeri, however, is more than just a striking saloon concept. Beneath its skin, it highlights technology Mazda has developed under the SkyActiv umbrella in its quest to improve the fuel economy of its entire range by 30 per cent by 2015. That promise was made in 2007 as part of Mazda bosses’ aim of offering hybrid-like efficiency from internal combustion engines.

Why, though, persevere with petrol and diesel when other manufacturers are moving towards electrification?

“There are two main reasons,” explains Uwe Kracht, vehicle team manager at Mazda Motor Europe. “Firstly, we still believe combustion engines offer great potential. For example, up to 30 per cent of the energy from these engines is still getting lost. The second reason is that we are convinced that in 2020 more than 80 per cent of cars will still use combustion engines.”

Mazda calculates that its goals for improving fuel economy and CO2 emissions by 2015 would only otherwise be possible if either half of its new passenger cars were hybrids or almost a quarter of them were full electric vehicles. Given the current take-up of such vehicles, it’s an unlikely situation.

SkyActive is the first step

The company’s first step towards that 2015 economy target was SkyActiv, a range of cleaner powertrains and lighter chassis and bodyshells that has already reached production in the shape of the CX-5 compact SUV, due in British showrooms this spring.

Of course, Mazda isn’t ruling out a fully electric car for the future, and it has already forged a licensing deal with Toyota to develop a hybrid that is expected next year. Kracht says: “For further development, we are following a ‘building block’ strategy, with SkyActiv at its base. We will develop the electrical applications in steps until perhaps some time in the future we will finally end up with an electric car.”

Back to top

The first building block in the foundations of SkyActiv was Mazda’s stop-start system. Called i-Stop, it will be fitted to all future SkyActiv petrol and diesel engines, and already appears on some models, including the 3 and 5. The system can restart the engine in a single compression stroke, something that Mazda claims is an industry first.

The Takeri concept is part of the second building stage and introduces the i-Eloop, the company’s regenerative braking system. Used in conjunction with the other SkyActiv developments, it contributes to impressive economy figures. “When Takeri is adopted with the SkyActiv 2.2 diesel engine, six-speed automatic transmission, modified i-Stop and i-Eloop, we can achieve the fuel efficiency of a hybrid, as well as outstanding dynamic performance and a cruising distance of 1500km [932 miles],” says Kracht. “With the SkyActiv technology we can already improve fuel economy by about 20 per cent from 2008 levels. With i-Stop and i-Eloop we can achieve another 10 per cent, so that we can meet our target of 30 per cent in 2015. I’m quite proud that we were the first to think of this idea of the capacitor. It is really a new generation of energy storage.”

Emissions of 106g/km

Mazda believes CO2 emissions for this specification of the Takeri could be as low as 106g/km. By comparison, the cleanest version of the current Mazda 6 produces 133g/km. That should mean the car could return in the region of 70mpg, an improvement of 15mpg over the existing, frugal Mazda 6 2.2D Business Line.

Mazda’s third building block will be to assess motor drive technologies, including the hybrid link-up with Toyota, looking at petrol, plug-in and hydrogen hybrids. In the meantime, the other building block technologies will still be moving forward. For example, future iterations of i-Eloop could use recouped energy to assist acceleration.

Environmental acceptability is only one of three attributes that Mazda wants its future production models to convey, along with bold design cues and a pleasing driving experience. “It’s a package: very efficient engines, compact transmissions and very light bodies,” says Birtwhistle. “But you can still drive these cars quite spiritedly, and because of all those inherent savings you’re still getting good fuel consumption and very good CO2 figures.”

Back to top

Latest technology

Mazda’s concept car designers also had to incorporate the latest technology into the Takeri, and the dimensions of the SkyActiv-G direct-injection petrol engine have had an impact on the shape of the car. “The SkyActiv engine features an exhaust manifold that exits at an angle, to get a clean, efficient flow of exhaust gases,” says Birtwhistle. “To make space for that, we had to push the cowl point and passenger area backwards. For a car of this size, that’s a plus point and, together with quite short overhangs, gives the car the look of a classical sporting limousine.”

As bold as the Takeri’s design is, it’s the technology under the skin that could have more impact. Mazda talks about the need to develop ‘multi-solutions’ to the environmental challenges facing car firms; it may not believe fully electric technology will dominate the market place, but nor does it think future cars will rely solely on fossil fuels.

Instead, Mazda’s vision of the car market in 2020 involves a blend of internal combustion engines and range-enhancing, emissions-reducing electric technologies – such as hybrids, stop-start and regenerative braking systems.

With its SkyActiv technology, Mazda makes a compelling case for the longevity of petrol and diesel as power sources. As far as it’s concerned, the future of the internal combustion engine is only just beginning.

Matt Burt

214101025314948179x39

Enjoy the week's top pictures in our free Car Pics iPad app - great high-res photography (1024x768 pixels) exclusive to the iPad

Download the Car Pics app for your iPad now

Join the debate

Comments
22
Add a comment…
disco.stu 8 April 2012

Re: The future of internal combustion?

Peter Cavellini wrote:
i think electric cars are a stop gap,i mean after all it took us decades to grasp solar panels on roofs for cheaper energy and heat our water,so a few years to iron out the cheap production of Hydrogen is worth it, even for future generations, don't you think?

I think there will be a market for hydrogen-powered range-extender hybrids to supplement if not replace petrol or diesel, but not anytime soon due to the massive investment required for filling station infrastructure. Right now it's not viable, but as the price of oil continues to increase, the numbers for hydrogen will eventually become competitive.

It's a pity that we don't yet have a vehicle which combines all the best-in-class features together to provide the bets possible picture of what can be done with today's technology. A car which combines the Ampera's range-extender tech with the best bits of Mazda's SkyActiv program, low weight due to aluminium and carbon-fibre construction expertise from the likes of Audi, a MultiAir petrol engine from FPT instead of the Ampera's GM engine, solar cells in the roof like the Fisker Karma, styling by Pininfarina and all backed up by Toyota's dealer network...

Peter Cavellini 20 March 2012

Re: The future of internal combustion?

NiallOswald wrote:

Peter Cavellini wrote:
And not spending the research money for zero emissions?, a tank of Hydrogen which in the Clarity goes 270 miles,fills up like a conventional car, more acceptable too today's generation, i think electric cars are a stop gap,i mean after all it took us decades to grasp solar panels on roofs for cheaper energy and heat our water,so a few years to iron out the cheap production of Hydrogen is worth it, even for future generations, don't you think?

You're missing the point that the hydrogen fuel cell is just another means of storing electrical energy. To produce large quantities of hydrogen cheaply requires large quantities of electrical energy.

Some rough numbers from here (with all assumptions made clear - including a somewhat pessimistic battery cycle efficiency): http://www.efcf.com/reports/E04.pdf

"The "power-plant-to-wheel" efficiency of a fuel cell vehicle operated on compressed gaseous hydrogen will be in the vicinity of 22%.

The "power plant-to-wheel" efficiency of a fuel cell vehicle operated on liquid hydrogen will be in the vicinity of 17%.

With these numbers the power-plant-to-wheel or wind-farm-to-wheel efficiency of an electric car with regenerative braking becomes 66%."

Best case is that you need 3 times as much input electrical energy using hydrogen for energy storage.

It's not the magic solution that episode of Top Gear with the FCX seems to have convinced most of the country that it is...

But still a guaranteed 270 miles , as opposed too say 110 miles....maybe less especially in Winter-time?

NiallOswald 20 March 2012

Re: The future of internal combustion?

Forum ate my reply.

1) 25% best case for a modern diesel.

2) Power plant to wheel efficiency is independent of generation type. Even with our current generation mix, EVs can deliver well under 100 g/km.

3) The largest, most efficient marine diesel engines achieve a little over 50% efficiency. Recovering energy from waste heat is a good idea (see turbo-compounding, as used on WWII aero engines).

4) Transmission and distribution losses are not 'massive'. 6-7%. The article I referenced estimates 55% hydrogen production and distribution efficiency (i.e. 45% losses). Hydrogen is a poor way of moving electrical energy from one place to another.

5) The numbers don't add up. Even best-case theoretical efficiencies for electrolysis and fuel cell operation compare badly to chemical battery cycle efficiencies.

6) No idea. The overall efficiency of any ICE-powered vehicle will be dominated by the low thermal efficiency of the combustion engine, whatever the fuel.