"The music of a racing car is like a symphony. Ahead it is a smooth and subdued whine superimposed on a commotion, not a noise, of a shape parting streamlines fast. As it passes, the full blast of the exhaust strikes, blood vessels throb and the faint whiff of racing oil thrills the senses.
"Inside, it is a sensation, the echo of power rattling around the box of the body and a thrust in the back whenever the accelerator is pressed."
The car that had inspired this fine prose from Autocar's Geoffrey Howard back on 6 April 1967 was the Alfa Romeo GTA, a Group 2 homologation special. This he watched practising at Silverstone ahead of the Spa 24 Hours (in which the GTA would go on to take class victory over cars including the Lotus Cortina).
And it's no surprise that he so admired this pretty sports coupé.
The GTA was a creation of Autodelta, Alfa Romeo's motorsport department, led by the knowing eye of Carlo Chiti, who had designed racing Alfas of the 1950s and two championship-winning Formula 1 cars for Ferrari.
It was the hottest variant of Alfa Romeo's bewilderingly expansive Type 105 model family, being essentially a racing version of the Giulia Sprint GT, itself based on a shortened version of the everyday Alfa Romeo Giulia saloon's floorpan.
Its construction was of a steel monocoque bonded to aluminium, rather than the usual steel, body panels. You see, the 'A' in the GTA's name stood for alleggerita, meaning 'lightened'. Further weight-saving measures included smaller, magnesium alloy wheels, plexiglass rear windows, lightweight interior trim and even different doorhandles. In the engine bay, parts including the camshaft cover, sump, timing cover and clutch housing were made from magnesium alloy.
The engine itself was the naturally aspirated 1.6-litre inline four taken as used in the standard Giulia, but upgraded with a new dual-ignition cylinder head, Weber carburettors and a Marelli distributor. This meant it could pump out around 160bhp.
Join the debate
Add your comment
Analogue/Digital and Cardigans
Agreed. Digital solutions are perfect in certain settings but wherever they involve a human interface, they seem cold and inhuman.
For instance, I still find far greater pleasure (and ease) looking at a bank of Smiths or Veglia instruments than scrolling through a digital dash.
Thank goodness for those cars and manufacturers that buck the trend and remember that cars are (for the time being) still driven by human beings.
Cardigan love is clearly the beginning of the end. If and when that day comes, I plan to meet my maker in a branch of EWM ;)
Mark
@Zimmerit
You're clearly a connoisseur of fine motors: Alfaholics GTA-R is a lot of money but then it's also a thing of rare lovelyness and (relatively speaking) good value when judged against other re-imagined classics.
If I added one to the garage, it would need to have one or two creature comforts, like more traditional seats, no roll-cage and be more of a daily driver - after all, why limit the pleasure just to the track?
Same mindset
I don’t believe Alfaholics have made any remotely similar GTA-R’s yet, at least not from what I can tell. I too would go for a road focused build not that I am adverse to the odd track day mind. I think they will even do a sequential flappy paddle box! Not that I would, I had a 1750 Spider for eight joyous years built by Westune to my own spec and that gearbox was a peach. Only a type R rivalled it in my experience.
As I get older I seem to increasingly slide to the analogue rather than digital. I’ll be concerned when I start ogling cardigans.
Corsa Quadrigoglio
Oh yes please, I very much doubt it will happen but then this is Alfa we are talking about. Speaking of 105 series GTA’s come the lottery win I am off to Alfaholics for a GTA-R. Yes they are hardly cheap but several years of judging Mr Banks exquisite 105 series restorations left me with a very very positive impression.