The 2017 F-Pace also gains Jaguar’s latest optional - and very good - InControl Touch Pro infotainment system, which costs £2670 and features a 10.1in central touchscreen and a 12.3in digital instrument cluster. The former is significantly more responsive than the old system and has higher-quality graphics, as well as dual-screen pixel technology that allows passengers to do things like watch a film on the same screen that’s displaying driving data or sat-nav instructions to the driver.
While it’s not new to JLR, it’s the first time this tech has been fitted to a Jaguar. For those not willing to fork out the extra cash, the car’s standard system has an 8.0in screen and older software, but it does still get sat-nav and a DAB radio.
What's it like?
Our drive is in an R-Sport trim model with 20in alloys wheels, and it rides very well over the bumps and undulations of British B-roads. The 2.0-litre engine comes mated exclusively to the eight-speed automatic gearbox and with four-wheel drive, so there’s no rear-wheel-drive manual option to really attack these roads. However, the worthwhile £160 option of Jaguar’s configurable dynamics adjustable dampers does help you to make the most out of bends.
You can firm up the dampers in Sport mode, and with this body control is very good - on par with the class’s best - but the eight-speed gearbox feels a little hesitant to act when the motor is worked hard and can therefore hamper the experience. Downshifts in particular can take about half a second to respond, and while you might be inclined to cut an SUV some slack in this department, the car’s arch-rival, the PDK-gearboxed Porsche Macan, shows how high the bar has been set.
Unlike the diesels, it lacks mid-range grunt – even the four-cylinder diesel has 37lb ft more - so is not so suited to hard motorway work. In its defence, the story is much the same with the four-cylinder petrol Porsche Macan, illustrating that the issue is a symptom of the type, rather than this specific unit.
There is one standout benefit of the new engine when charging along at pace - its lighter weight. It gives the car a nose that resists understeer even more and makes the four-wheel torque vectoring more noticeable when powering through a corner. Like the Macan, the F-Pace does a great job of impersonating a hot hatch when trail braked into a bend, resisting body roll and even lending its back to tighten the line with small slides. But as soon as you get back on the power you’re reminded that the lump up front could do with a bit more torque, confirming that this engine will offer its best in less sporting environments.
Should I buy one?
The timing of the Ingenium petrol engine’s arrival in the F-Pace range couldn’t be much better, as public perception of diesels – particularly in urban environments – is at an all-time low. People nervous of impending tax hikes and pricier parking permits may be drawn to a small capacity petrol engine that gives respectable fuel economy and has just about enough poke to be entertaining.
It serves to make the F-Pace a more comprehensive rival to the Porsche Macan, and extends the line-up to better compete with more conventional SUVs such as the Audi Q5.
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0 i4 250 R-Sport auto
Location Warwickshire On sale Now Price £44,460 Engine 4 cyls, 1997cc, petrol Power 247bhp at 5500rpm Torque 269lb ft at 1200-4500rpm Gearbox 8-spd automatic Kerb weight 1760kg 0-62mph 6.8sec Top speed 135mph Economy 38.2mpg (combined) CO2/tax band 170g/km Rivals Porsche Macan, Audi Q5
Get all the best car news, reviews and opinions direct to your inbox three times a week. You can unsubscribe via any email we sendSee our full privacy notice for more details
I was wondering when I'd get to read a test with the petrol Ingenium engine. This is certainly the engine I'd choose
"is not so suited to hard motorway work" - I think the tester has been driving too many supercars, or drives a lot faster on the motorway than the limit, if he thinks a 250hp SUV isn't fast enough.
That's a very good point as I was thinking exactly the same thing. Can't see how this car with almost 250 bhp would not be a decent motorway car, As Mikey C points out, maybe the tester has been spoilt with the V6's and V8's of this world
I echo Mike & Turin brakes. If 0-60 in 6.8s 'never feels fast' you have the wrong comparators.
Likewise the comment about creating a bit of slide going into corners - a typical journalist bit of idiocy. If I slide my SUV going into corners with my wife and 4 yr old son on board my life is going to be hell, for a while anyway.
Why do Autocar have to review every car as if was a sports car instead of thinking about who buyers of this type of car are likely to be.
I have a Q5 TDi now (bought before the F Pace was launched) but don't want another diesel and this looks just the ticket for my next car.
Join the debate
Add your comment
Time to stop these munters
A Jaguar 4 pots lorry... Why
:-|
At last
"is not so suited to hard motorway work" - I think the tester has been driving too many supercars, or drives a lot faster on the motorway than the limit, if he thinks a 250hp SUV isn't fast enough.
That's a very good point as I
Fast enough
Likewise the comment about creating a bit of slide going into corners - a typical journalist bit of idiocy. If I slide my SUV going into corners with my wife and 4 yr old son on board my life is going to be hell, for a while anyway.
Why do Autocar have to review every car as if was a sports car instead of thinking about who buyers of this type of car are likely to be.
I have a Q5 TDi now (bought before the F Pace was launched) but don't want another diesel and this looks just the ticket for my next car.