From £104,0259

Is the Mk5 Range Rover better than not only all its peers, but all its predecessors too? We find out

The pick of the engines is Range Rover's Ingenium six-cylinder diesel. In D350 trim it delivers 345bhp and 516lb ft, yet in normal driving you barely know it’s switched on.

Even when you ask a lot of this powertrain – and a fully fuelled weight of 2667kg as tested means you might need to – it’s smooth and unobtrusive.

I barely noticed the rev counter. The Range Rover is so muted it just pops itself into a mid-range you’ll barely hear and thrums in the middle distance.

From rest, two-up and fully gassed, it went from 0-60mph in 6.3sec – a little off the claim but a number that still means it’s a fast and capable machine. A smoothly responsive one, too, with easily selectable gear ratios if you opt to use the gearshift paddles yourself, and a long throttle travel with predictable kickdown if you opt to let the gearbox software do it for you.

In more relaxed driving, this is one of those cars where it’s usually unnoticeable which gear it’s adopting, and while there’s only so much the best software and hardware in the world can do about the fuel consumption of a car of this size, it does its best, adopting as high gear as sensible without labouring the engine or harming the refinement. At a 70mph cruise, an eighth-gear ratio that means the engine is spinning over at just 1550rpm keeps it particularly unobtrusive.

The PHEVs are responsive and when the 3.0 petrol engine is zinging along, it’s doing it very quietly in the background, with just a little sporting edge to it. Things are more responsive if you pull the gearlever into ‘S’ rather than ‘D’ but the electric motor is there to assist anyway – you can just use throttle rather than have to pull gears to make progress.

Advertisement
Back to top

BMW's V8 petrol engine does suit the Range Rover and is a deserving and indulgent fit for the flagship models. There’s a faint woofle at low speeds, building to a cultured growl under harder loads and at higher revs. It's available in a couple of different outputs but either one is brisk. The V8 is unstressed, even when pulling out to overtake slow-moving traffic on an A-road. At times, though, the V8 can feel a touch too involved. It is particularly tricky to judge throttle modulation. Under acceleration it just wants to give it the full beans, whereas the typical Range Rover driver may want a more refined, dignified take-off from a set of traffic lights.

Braking is a touch less impressive than the engines. Unfortunately, the test track never quite managed to dry out during our day at Millbrook, so we had to deal with some damp patches. Even so, a 60-0mph time of 3.67sec and a 70-0mph distance of 66.2m are poor.

The last time we tested a 2.5-plus-tonne car in the damp, it was only 7deg C outside, yet the BMW iX needed 3.42sec and 57.8m over the same benchmarks. Our Range Rover was on all-season tyres, the BMW on road rubber, which goes some way to explaining the discrepancy.