What is it?
We drove the new Mercedes-Benz C-Class last week overseas but we’ve now driven it in the UK, albeit still early left-hand-drive examples.
The one most different from last week’s test car was this C200 petrol estate, presented in a slightly unknown spec because it’s non-specific to any particular trim level. But it did run on swanky 19in wheels and have a high-specification interior.
The estate is the same 4751mm length as the saloon, unlike the previous model, which was a touch longer than the four-door, while it has a 490-litre boot (rising to 1510 litres with the seats folded), all but the same (500-1510 litres) as the C-Class’s arch rival, the BMW 3 Series.
The other boot numbers – the ones on the outside – don’t always correlate to engine capacity these days and this C200 is no exception, with a 1.5-litre petrol engine with integrated 48V mild-hybrid starter-generator that boosts low-end torque and response.
The engine provides 201bhp and 221lb ft, and, briefly, the motor another 20bhp and 148lb ft, but you can’t just add the numbers together to get a maximum because both elements won’t be working their hardest at the same time.
Join the debate
Add your comment
Did I finally see a mention of the seeming insanity of adding elctric power output to combustion bhp to form an exact sum, or was that line just referring to torque?
This never made sense to me. A 200 bhp petrol engine say, and a motor with 50 bhp. Why does that produce the same as a 250 bhp engine?
"Won't care less" is not quite "would'nt / couldn't care less", but at least it's better than the goddawful "could care less" which has become the norm.
AMG cars aside, I've always thought of Mercs as comfortable/luxury cars, not ones that you drive hard like a BMW. Not sure why that would be used as a critism
I think Matt's summary covers Mercedes' current approach towards their cars very well and is a view I've held for a while. That is Mercedes seems more concerned about style, gadgets and producing a wow-factor rather than substance and how good a car could or should be. This approach started with the previous (and disappointing) A-Class since when many of Mercedes' models haven't been as good as they should have been, probably heightened by the latest S-Class which seems a massive disappointment. Yes, their cars may have glitzy, showing interiors that look great and they may feature fancy gadgets, but when it comes to dynamics, interior quality and the standards of some of drivetrains, it's been more miss than hit during the past decade. A far cry from the days when Mercedes were engineered like no other car.