From £39,0007

One of our favourite electric SUVs has been lit up – but don’t expect fireworks

There isn’t much ‘victory Rally Sport’ about a 2.2-tonne electric crossover, but Skoda has never been precious about its sporty vRS badge, and if anything this has been to its advantage.

The initials have been applied to subjects as diverse as diesel superminis and plug-in hybrid estates, but we’ve always known what they stand for: a sensible injection of performance and a measured stab of handling intent, plus a lightly racy interior trim and high equipment levels.

Those ingredients work with almost any model in the range, and without inviting overbearing expectation from the fanbase. Witness how Volkswagen has so far not dared to bestow GTI status on its EVs or crossovers, lest a PR disaster unfold. But an Enyaq vRS? Sure, why not?

Skoda launched the Enyaq vRS – its most powerful and expensive model – in 2022 with 295bhp and 338lb ft and a Lamborghini-like, acid-green ‘hero’ colour. Three years later there’s a new version, which has 335bhp and 402lb ft but costing £1500 or so less. This not only busts inflation but also goes counter to the newer car’s better equipment and bigger battery (claimed range is now 344 miles, up from 296 miles, while the rapid-charging speed has risen from 135kW to 185kW). Talk about swimming against the tide. At £51,660, the vRS sits just above the regular Skoda Enyaq Sportline.

Alongside a performance bump, it comes with highly adjustable DCC dampers as standard, along with electric massage seats for both front occupants and, of course, the sharp-but-subtle vRS styling. Rivals include quicker variants of the Ford Mustang Mach-E, Volkswagen ID 4, Kia EV6 and Tesla Model Y – some, but not all, of which the Skoda undercuts on price. 

Advertisement
Back to top

INTERIOR

9
Skoda Enyaq vRS review 2025 010

The cockpit architecture is unchanged from before, and it's unchanged from that of the regular Enyaq. Those raked A-pillars and the never-ending upper dashboard still give the place an MPV-like atmosphere. Think Renault Espace and Toyota Previa – especially given that the Toyota went without instruments directly in front of the driver long before Tesla made it fashionable with the Model 3.

What isn’t MPV-like about the Skoda is its driving position, which is surprisingly snug and low, with plenty of adjustability in the steering column. The same applies to the generously bolstered – and, frankly, fantastically comfortable – seats and the reams of Alcantara-like microsuede that adorn the cabin, extending to the door cards and the central armrest. This is a pleasant place to be for long drives, and of course that famously spacious Enyaq second row is unaffected by vRS specification. 

Skoda still makes the Enyaq in coupé form too, although the drop in boot capacity that comes with it does undermine the point of having a comparatively large car.

ENGINES & PERFORMANCE

7
Skoda Enyaq vRS review 2025 017

The driving experience remains on the steady side. With so much weight to propel, that 402lb ft total feels less punchy than it sounds. The Enyaq ensures the initial delivery of torque arrives sensitively rather than making the driver feel like they’ve just flicked a switch.

Even so, overtakes are fantastically easy. Flat out, the Enyaq feels about as quick as a fully uncorked E39 BMW M5, although the EV’s turn of pace comes almost immediately. So it’s quick enough, but the brakes need work. Certain car makers are starting to suss out how to solve the part-regenerative, part-physical braking-feel conundrum, but Skoda isn’t yet one of them on this evidence. The pedal is soft and imprecise, and while there are regen paddles behind the steering wheel, the car frustratingly reverts to a mode-dependent default setting.

Handling is a similar story – good but not exactly memorable. There’s plenty of traction and stability, but despite the fact that the torque split is considerably rear-biased, there’s not much in the way of natural poise, as you get with the Mustang Mach-E. The vRS is not fun, although it is well damped, meaning that what it lacks in enjoyment it makes up for in rolling refinement and a pervasive calmness. It is superbly assured on any road, in any weather.

Equally, an Enyaq Sportline 85x optioned with the DCC dampers does even better in respect of road manners. So the question is: are you going to enjoy the vRS’s subtly more resolute steering action, its subtly better roll-resistance (courtesy of thicker anti-roll bars) and its subtly racier looks? You might well, in which case, it’s a great car. If not, there are better Enyaqs for less.

MPG & RUNNING COSTS

7
Skoda Enyaq vRS review 2025 001

It's disappointing that Skoda charges extra for a heat-pump, but in general the top-billing Enyaq is very well equipped and on par with the similarly priced Tesla Model Y Long Range All-Wheel Drive and the Kia EV6 GT-Line. Anybody who really cares about the driving experience should consider the broader context: a PHEV BMW 3 Series Touring with nearly 300bhp currently costs three grand less than the Skoda.

Efficiency is rated at 3.9mpkWh, with a claimed range of 344 miles, and there's that improved maximum charging rate of 185kW (though this is still lower than that of the Kia and the Tesla). We're yet to put the vRS through an instrument road test, but its understudy, the Elroq 85 Edition, has been tested, and it returned a touring economy of 3.5mpkWh (for a range of 270 miles) and 4.8mpkWh (370 miles) for everyday economy. We'd expect the vRS to manage similar figures.

VERDICT

7
Skoda Enyaq vRS review 2025 023

Skoda deserves credit for making a better car less expensive. The new Enyaq vRS looks sharper, goes quicker, goes farther and charges faster than the pre-facelifted model it replaces, yet it costs less. It remains a serious contender in the quick family crossover EV class, despite the quality of the opposition.

The only thing we'd question is the necessity of the vRS's extra power and focus. This is a fast car, and one with deep reserves of composure that allow it to cover ground very quickly indeed, but it fails to provide the genuinely engaging handling that's required in order to build on these traits. The Enyaq vRS is more competent that it is lovable, and it doesn't quite do enough to distance itself from the similarly capable models lower down the range. 

Richard Lane

Richard Lane, Autocar
Title: Deputy road test editor

Richard joined Autocar in 2017 and like all road testers is typically found either behind a keyboard or steering wheel (or, these days, a yoke).

As deputy road test editor he delivers in-depth road tests and performance benchmarking, plus feature-length comparison stories between rival cars. He can also be found presenting on Autocar's YouTube channel.

Mostly interested in how cars feel on the road – the sensations and emotions they can evoke – Richard drives around 150 newly launched makes and models every year. His job is then to put the reader firmly in the driver's seat.