What is it?
Pleasant surprises of an affordable nature are not a common occurrence in this industry, but the Suzuki Swift Sport of 2006 was such a thing. So too was Suzuki's 2012-2016 Suzuki Swift Sport replacement six years later, and now we have this: a third iteration that seeks to prolong the car’s reputation as a bit of a drivers’ gem.
The basic recipe has, alas, changed a little. The old car’s sharply responsive atmospheric 1.6-litre engine is replaced with a marginally more powerful Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4-litre that already serves in the high-riding Suzuki Vitara and Suzuki S-Cross. Its headline figure of 138bhp is almost incidental in this case, because forced induction has resulted in 170lb ft of torque from 2500rpm. That’s almost half as much again as the previous Swift Sport and has the potential to markedly alter the previous car’s snappy personality.
This new car is, however, lighter than the one it replaces. Built alongside the Suzuki Ignis and quirky Xbee crossover at the marque’s Sagara plant in Japan, the saving amounts to 70kg – a substantial deficit brought about largely by redesigning certain suspension components, not least the torsion-beam rear axle, and a more bulbous but stiffer new body, which is significantly lighter than before.
It drops the Swift Sport into sub-tonne territory and gives it a 0-62mph time of 8.2sec, which looks favourable next to a combined fuel economy of 50.4mpg. Top speed, meanwhile, is 130mph.
In design terms this car is still recognisably Suzuki Swift but rather more hulking at the kerbside. The dimensions are largely unchanged – it’s fractionally shorter and lower than a Toyota Yaris GRMN, but wider – yet the chassis sits 50mm closer to the tarmac than before, with carbon-effect bumpers and skirts exaggerating the drop. In comparison to non-Sport Swifts, it’s also 40mm wider.
In profile, it’s a little more svelte than before, and Suzuki claims new intake strakes along with engine and floor undercovers help reduce wind resistance by a tenth. You do, however, still get a pair of cannon-esque exhaust tips and 17in wheels wrapped in 195-section rubber. Overall it’s not the prettiest thing, though you’d never mistake it for anything other than the most potent model in the range.
Standard specification is good, with DAB radio and satellite navigation. There are also LED headlights and tail lights, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera, keyless entry and a 4.2in display within the main instrument binnacle that can show boost pressure along with horsepower and torque.
Join the debate
Add your comment
MINI?
A basic Mini Cooper has similar performance figures and isn't much more expensive with some choice options. The SSS needs to be £15-16k though maybe the discounts won't take long to appear.
Yep, the VW Up GTI is not comparable...
...and not only dimensional-wise, but also power- or equipment related. Even if the Up GTI is also a bang-for-the buck offer (pardon, pound. ;-))
Suffice to see the ultra-normalos and non-supportive seats of the small GTI (a 90- to 115 hp chipped 1.0 TSI with 17 rims finally) and the seats of this Swift, really thought for sporty driving.
And, as @72Gav and @LP_In_Brighton very well noticed, this only 3-star evaluation is hard to understand - and even harder, if we take in account the previous (in Japan) First-Drive 4 stars given by the same Autocar team!
In a general sense, we are
In a general sense, we are now several years past 'peak car', after which point it has been generally a case of how much less desirable a new model is than the old.