Why we ran it: To see what lessons could be learned from running a Toyota Land Cruiser, the most old-school of current offerings
Month 3 - Month 2 - Month 1 - Specs
Life with a Toyota Land Cruiser: Month 3
Are the old ways still the best? Our final verdict on living with this trad 4x4 tells all - 2 August 2023
Usually I’ve formulated a strong view on a car – its strengths, weaknesses and rightful position in the world – after a few months with it, but now my Toyota Land Cruiser has gone, I’m not sure how I feel, or should feel. I liked it in some ways, I disliked it in others, and the novelty value I enjoyed at first didn’t last.
Being a city dweller with a long motorway commute, I was hardly enthused by the prospect of having a diesel-guzzling, permanently all-paw, giant SUV – and indeed one of a design that had barely changed in the preceding two decades.
The premise of this test, though, wasn’t to prove an obvious point – a square peg doesn’t fit in a round hole – but to discover if progress in some areas had not been progress at all, if any lessons could be relearned from the oldest of the old-school.
Let me get one thing out of the way right away: in terms of driving, we all have certainly gained rather than lost, at least in the SUV class. You may be cynical about modern SUVs – and that can be justified in many ways – but the Land Cruiser isn’t agreeable to drive on the road.
The combination of antiquated body-on-frame construction, a tall body, permanent four-wheel drive, lazy steering and Toyota’s 2.8-litre four-pot diesel always felt poor in isolation; let alone when I compared it with the straight-six Land Rover Defender, a car of similar intentions but introduced a decade more recently.
The floaty yet jittery ride, the vague dynamics, the grumbling of the motor, the economy that was so stubbornly poor (on diesel!) as to make a pint at the pub an enviable luxury for me… All of it would be better consigned to history. Sorry.
There was a payoff, however, which was unshakeable off-road ability. I had never driven in the rough before, so I booked onto a course with Surrey 4x4 Tours and Training. My instructors – original Defender men both – were highly impressed by the Land Cruiser’s abilities, in the main thanks to its very clever assistance systems.
Join the debate
Add your comment
Great to see a properly iconic vehcile still being made and also Autocar reviewing it. I loved Matt Prior's thoughts (he totally gets what a Land Cruiser is) on the base spec 3 door, and this 7 seat lux model is sufficiently different to merit another long term report.
However, it's rather annoying to see this writer correctly describe the screen as 9" in one portion of the review then erraneously call it 8" in another. But even worse is this quote:
"Furthermore, despite the fact that the JLR unit makes 296bhp and gives a 0-62mph time of 7.0sec while the Toyota one scores 201bhp and 12.7sec, you actually get 4mpg more from the Defender, officially speaking and from my experience.
Both have permanent four-wheel drive and the Defender is actually 226kg heavier, and certainly aerodynamics aren’t helping here, so this must be totally down to the engine and gearbox."
No, sir, the huge acceleration differential is entirely explained by you quoting the figrues for the previous 174hp/450NM version of the engine discontinued in late 2019. The correct figures for the 2.8 with 201hp and 500nm is 9.9 seconds for the 7 seat Invincible. So a 2.9 second delta for 95 hp starts to make a lot more sense. Please do better, it's your job.
Are you sure this is allowed in Autocar these days? I didnt think you were interested in things with internal combustion any longer
Right... do you ever read Autocar, or does that interfere with your 'not even allowed a sausage these days' nonsense?
Matt Prior ran one on a long term test just a few years ago. Could you really not get anything else?