What is it?
This is what will soon be the older and bigger of two SUVs from Alfa Romeo, the Stelvio - and it has just had a mid-life facelift.
There are tweaks and upgrades for the interior, whose relative shortage of genuinely impressive perceived quality and up-to-date on-board technology came in for criticism when it was launched three years ago. The car’s equipment levels have now been improved across the range, while new active safety and level two semi-autonomous driving technologies have been added to the options list.
UK-based Stelvio buyers can choose a car in Super, Sprint, Lusso Ti or Veloce trim and powered by a 197bhp 2.0-litre turbo petrol or 188bhp 2.1-litre diesel four-cylinder engine across most of the range, with only Veloce models increasing the power outputs of those engines to either 276bhp or 207bhp respectively. And then there's the madcap 503bhp Quadrifoglio performance version, a car that, in just the right circumstances, may even be a faster and more dependable way to make your children return their breakfast than any emetic drug.
The Stelvio uses standard coil spring suspension, with lowered and firmed-up springs and ‘frequency-selective’ dampers coming on Veloce versions. A Performance Pack that adds fully adaptive dampers and a mechanical limited-slip differential for the rear axle is optional on all bar the entry-level Super version.
All Stelvios get an eight-speed automatic gearbox, and all get Q4 clutch-based four-wheel drive except the rear-driven, entry-level diesel. Prices now start at a whisker under £40,000, which is a hike of between 6% and 10% on 2019-model-year brochure prices - although that comparison doesn’t allow for the new car’s enriched specification.
Alfa’s Stelvio engines were made Euro-6D WLTP-compliant in 2018, and no revisions have been made to the car’s suspension or steering systems, or to any of its powertrains.
Join the debate
Add your comment
Matt
Matt Saunders, this must be real Alfa hater. cant say more, this is ridiculous review. Total lies full, and this wasnt Alfa mid life facelift, this was minor update to to interior. In real life Alfa interior quality is fully in par for example Jaguar. Maybe next time check those Audis and Mercs poor qualities also? they have also those.
Lot of passion in this
I am wrestling between an Alfa and a Merc and its probably the better value of the Merc and great engines that's winning. But after long test drives and playing around up close with plastics I could not say a Merc interior is that much better than the Alfa. Screens are better, clearly but not that concerning for me if I use Car Play and have an IPAD at home. Its tit for tat the Merc interiors look great at a distance but if you look closely there is a hell of a lot of cheap plastic e.g. centre cubies, rear vents, plastic leather, Alfa looses points for quality of door bins and vents. Its true the brake feel is a smidge off its bit hair trigger but I think I would get used to that. Neither steer anything like as consistently as any Jaguar - period and both fidget and shake on broken roads with the Merc being worse. BTW both the cars I road tested had electrical gremlins the merc kep noisily reporting the key was not in proximity when it was in the slot and the Alfa came up with a tyre pressure warning. What this ramble is trying to say is IMHO there is less between cars these days than winers and losers reviews suggest.
Typical, absolutely typical...
A typically biased, negative review from Autocar of a car that has the AUDACITY to commit the unforgivable SIN of being something other than a BMW, a Jaguar or a Land Rover.
Did they run out of faint praise? Find out next week when they review other cars that aren't from their favoured marques.