Why we ran it: The Mercedes EQC won our EV SUV mega-test 12 months ago, but was it an Audi, Jaguar and Tesla beater in everyday life?
Month 6 - Month 5 - Month 4 - Month 3 - Month 2 - Month 1 - Prices and specs
Life with a Mercedes-Benz EQC: Month 6
Did Benz hit the ground running with the first of its EQ family? Here’s our verdict - 19 May 2021
The Mercedes-Benz EQC’s Autocar journey started with an extremely complimentary review; moved on to a group test win against the obvious rivals from Audi, Jaguar and Tesla; and then – six months and a host of updates from the opposition later – retained its crown when put under the microscope again, this time on video, by our expert road test team.
In the midst of this winning streak, along came KV20 YCE, on paper an electric GLC carrying a near-£75,000 price tag but in reality so much more. I remember its arrival well, because the sun was shining and lockdown was easing. My teenage son had some friends over for a game of cricket, and even this hard-to- impress audience stood and nodded approvingly, drawn in by the story of electrification and left gawping by the giant wheels, oversized Mercedes badge and shimmering paint work.
What those comparison tests revealed was that the EQC was the best all-rounder in its class, delivering a balance of comfort, capability and – crucially – range that the opposition could pick off in isolation but not in totality. Expressed in negative terms, the Audi is marginally plusher, the Jaguar better to drive and the Tesla boosted immeasurably by its range and access to a charging infrastructure you can rely on. All three, however, have weaknesses that undermine their overall packages. The Mercedes has none.
What this longer-term test (supposedly daily, although Tier 4 and National Lockdown 2 put paid to some of that ambition) layered on top of those winning verdicts was a very real sense of just how special the EQC is.
While you can perhaps assume that a family-sized SUV engineered by an established premium brand will have a decent baseline of capability, what you may not get a sense of immediately through snapshot reviews is the almost intangible sense of feeling good that comes with this car. You might argue that at this price it should deliver something extra. I can assure you that this isn’t always the case.
Join the debate
Add your comment
Why does this article have the sub-head: “as long as we don’t forget to charge it” ?
You wouldn’t write “as long as we don’t forget to fill it with fossil fuel” if it was an IC car. Autocar should really guard against portraying EVs with prejudice in this way.
Based on this then the realistic range is 200 miles. The reason for getting the extra miles on the way back is probably due to lack of preconditioning, I find that if I do this at home I will get more range on the outward journey.
The collisions with the cyclist highlights the big problem with slow-moving EVs. So many pedestrians/cyclists use their ears to check if the road is clear and don't hear silent EVs. Yes, I know the rules are being changed so that EVs have to make a sound at low speed, but this Merc was clearly built prior.
Nope, Acoustic Vehicle Alerting Systems have been mandated on EVs since July 2019. I think they're still manually disable-able (not for much longer) but you have to do this every time the car starts so I'd be surprised if Jim had turned his off.
They're bloody useless though. Most of the external noise of a modern combustion car comes from the tyres, not the engine. Above 5mph, EVs are not silent. If you're driving at 10mph+ and someone can't hear your tyres, they won't hear the engine or AVAS either. As demonstrated here.
In my experience, all the AVAS really accomplishes is mild irritation for the occupants if the window's open or the car has poor insulation.