Renault isn’t alone in bringing hydrogen fuel cell technology to the market, with the Hyvia van and drop-in hydrogen filling stations.
Stellantis is on a similar course, too, with the Opel/Vauxhall Vivaro Hydrogen and Movano Hydrogen, the latter making its debut at the IAA Transportation show in Hanover earlier this year.
The Vivaro has a 248-mile range and is powered by a hybrid combination of a 45kW hydrogen fuel cell and rechargeable 10.5kWh lithium ion traction battery.
Three underfloor tanks can store up to 4.4kg of compressed hydrogen to power the van via its 134bhp electric drive motor.
The Movano has a range of 310 miles. Power is from a 148bhp electric motor with 302lb ft of torque and the hydrogen fuel cell works in conjunction with a 11kWh lithium ion battery.
In total, Stellantis will have eight hydrogen fuel cell versions of mid-size vans, from Opel/Vauxhall, Citroën, Fiat and Peugeot.
Hydrogen fuel cell technology is part of a long game being played by manufacturers that have gained huge experience in it over the years.
Stellantis (specifically, Opel) has been on the case for more than 20 years. Opel’s previous owner, General Motors, developed one of the first hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, the Electrovan, in 1966.
In 2000 Opel showed the Zafira HydroGen1, which relied on liquid hydrogen storage. In those early days, the focus was on trying to develop fuel cell systems that could provide similar transient response to a combustion engine.
Hydrogen fuel cells are at their best delivering a steady stream of electrical energy and are less ideal at providing sudden increases in power.
But early on in their development, the aim was to avoid the extra cost and complexity of a hybrid battery or ultra-capacitor to provide the boost needed for acceleration or pulling away.
Join the debate
Add your comment
Anyone spot what the hydrogen fool lobby don't want you to know, clue: Fuel flap?
Not to mention the vacuum cleaner hose attached to that fake hydrogen pump!
The reason why hydrogen failed is it uses 3x as much energy to move the same distance as BEV, costs 10-50x more than BEV and is way more inconvenient. It's never been a good idea for land transport and physics means it never will be.