Currently reading: Questions over safety as ICE drivers swap into "brutally" fast EVs

Is the instant power delivery of an EV too much for unwary and inexperienced drivers?

With an Audi S6 for weekdays and a Toyota GR Supra for weekends, Philip Thomas could fairly be described as a petrolhead.

At least that was until the IT specialist stunned his neighbours by recently adding a third car to his fleet: a Smart #1.

How the curtains twitched, but this was no ordinary #1. Although the standard model has a Golf GTI-beating 268bhp, Thomas had instead opted for the Brabus variant with 422bhp – around as much as his Audi.

However, where the S6 is a low-slung saloon with performance engineered into it, the Smart #1 Brabus is a compact SUV that, aside from its additional, front-mounted motor, is almost identical to the standard model, right down to its tyres and suspension.

“The Brabus is certainly quick, but it’s not very elegant,” commented our road testers when they got their hands on the model.

Thomas describes the Brabus’s performance as “brutal”. “You can feel the twin turbos in the Audi and the Toyota winding up and the power coming in, but on the Brabus the power is instant,” he says.

“If you aren’t paying attention, you can be doing 80mph in a flash. The fact that there’s no increase in engine noise doesn’t help. It’s very fast, but you can feel the system fussing away as it shares power between the motors, whereas my S6 just feels planted.

"I couldn’t imagine my elderly mum going from her Skoda Fabia to even just the 268bhp Smart #1.”

However, that’s exactly the kind of switch increasing numbers of drivers are making as they migrate to electric cars.

They may not be going straight into 422bhp EVs, but many are trading across, or up, into cars that can comfortably out-accelerate a hot hatch.

Of the new EVs on the forecourt, only a handful, including the Volkswagen ID 5 Pro 174PS, take 10 seconds or longer to accelerate from 0-62mph.

Back to top

The subject of EVs and their surplus of performance has been given fresh attention by a leading motor insurance broker.

They told us that electric cars are involved in more accidents than petrol- and diesel-engined models, and the only explanation can be that they’re quicker.

“There are 26% more accident claims for EVs than for ICE vehicles,” says Carl Shuker, CEO of Howden UK&I Retail (formerly known as A-Plan), an insurance broker with 220 high street offices across the UK and Ireland.

“Why are more EVs crashed? Because they’re much faster. Compared with the overall car parc, EVs are skewed to the higher performance end.

"In higher-performance ICE cars you see more claims than for regular cars, so if the whole population of EVs is high performance, you’re going to get a higher claims frequency.”

Shuker adds that it’s not just that EVs are more powerful, but it’s the way their power is delivered that can wrong-foot drivers.

“It’s instant with an EV, so it’s a different driving experience from an ICE vehicle,” he says. “Even so, I suspect the mix and type of accidents will be the same as everything else. 

"The frequency of accidental damage with EVs is higher, but fortunately the frequency of serious injury is lower, because of their safety features and technology.”

Shuker is one of the few people in the insurance industry to say higher performance and higher accident rates are among the reasons EVs are more expensive to insure than ICE cars.

Other firms have already emphasised the higher repair costs of EVs, and Shuker agrees, saying the average repair cost of an EV is £2570, compared with £1916 for an ICE vehicle.

He adds that they take on average 14% longer to repair, in part because of the shortage of suitably qualified technicians. But few have pointed the finger at EVs’ high performance quite so starkly.

Howden’s experience of EVs’ higher crash rates is shared by Hertz, which last January defleeted 20,000 of its Teslas.

One reason given for the move was that they were involved in more accidents than the renter’s ICE vehicles.

According to insurance analyst LexisNexis, drivers switching from an ICE vehicle to an EV are more likely to crash in their first year of EV ownership than someone switching from one ICE vehicle to another.

To bring down EVs’ accident rates, Shuker would like to see better driver training and the EV performance race brought under control, but he accepts that the only real solution is more widespread familiarity with the cars.

He recalls his grandmother being caught speeding for the first time.

“She explained she was in a hurry before her car ran out of petrol,” he says. “I wonder if a little bit of that goes on with EVs.” 

Join our WhatsApp community and be the first to read about the latest news and reviews wowing the car world. Our community is the best, easiest and most direct place to tap into the minds of Autocar, and if you join you’ll also be treated to unique WhatsApp content. You can leave at any time after joining - check our full privacy policy here.

Join the debate

Comments
9
Add a comment…
john999s 20 December 2024

Autocar complaing about cars being too fast?? Please!! It stinks of being another EV hit piece. Embarrassing.

European data says EV's are safer and have a lower frequency of accidents compared with ICE cards but are much more expensive to repair. That I can believe.

Perhaps the UK is an outlier compared with the rest of Europe. In any case, on the whole EV's do have an addictive torque hit and can be uncomfortably fast if you press the pedal. But you don't have to drive them like that and actually it's a calmer, smoother and much cleaner experience regardless of the manufacturer.

Andrew1 20 December 2024

It's not the first time. A while ago they noted as a negative in a review that the car was too fast. It was a French car.

Andrew1 20 December 2024

Behold the latest anti-EV fart!

Marc 20 December 2024

Different EV's can deliver their power in very different ways. We have two, a BYD Dolphin and Cupra Born, they are similar size, similar power output, on paper performance and battery size, although one is front drive and the other rear. The Cupra is very much instant off the line power delivery and feels much quicker than the performance figures suggest, but performance tails off noticeably over 60 mph, the Dolphin is opposite, feeling relatively sluggish off the line but power seems to rapidily increase afterwards leading to two very different feeling cars. That feeling also translates to realworld performance, lining the two up from a standstill start the Cupra gets a significant jump on the Dolphin off the line, and it stays that way to about 50mph, when the Dolphin catches up and stays with it until both hit their limiters. The Cupra feels very much like an electric car, whereas the BYD feels like a petrol car rather than electric.