Currently reading: MPs find state of England's local roads is 'national embarrassment'

Department for Transport is failing to take the problem 'sufficiently seriously', according to new report by MPs

The Department for Transport (DfT) is failing in its responsibility to care for local roads such that their condition is now a “national embarrassment”.

That's according to a damning new report published by the House of Commons’ Public Accounts Committee – the group of MPs responsible for overseeing the value for money and services provided by government programmes.

Its inquiry found that “the state of England’s local roads is declining” yet “the DfT neither knows exactly how authorities spend its funding, as it is not ring-fenced, nor what it wants to achieve with it”. 

Among the issues identified in the report are a failure to take policy and the use of taxpayer funds “sufficiently seriously” when looking at the 183,000 miles of local roads across England – 98% of the total network.

It added that the DfT has insufficient knowledge of the condition of the local road network and that its approach to funding their maintenance is too focused on short-term repairs.

The report comes after the National Audi Office (NAO) last year reported that the government “does not know” whether £1.6 billion of taxpayer money is actually making a difference to the state of English roads.

The NAO said the DfT does not have a good enough understanding of the condition of local roads, nor does it allocate funding to local authorities “as effectively as possible”.

The Public Accounts Committee's chairman and Conservative MP for the North Cotswolds, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, said: “The declining state of England’s local roads is a national embarrassment.

“As well as harming the prospects for our economy and communities’ own social wellbeing, highways riddled with potholes pose an increasing safety threat to road users. 

“Alarmingly, however, not only is the state of our local roads on the downslope, [but also] our inquiry shows government are having to find out about these issues from industry bodies and road users themselves, due to their own patchy data.”

In turn, the Committee has made nine key recommendations.

On the failure to take the condition of local roads seriously, it said the DfT should “clearly set out its roles and responsibilities”, because it "has not taken enough responsibility, given the declining conditions of local roads across England”. 

On the DfT’s insufficient knowledge of the condition of roads, it suggested the DfT should work with the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government to better its odds of achieving a reliable dataset.

Back to top

The DfT said it doesn't ask local authorities for information such as the condition of walkways and cycle paths so as not to create a “large burden of work”.

However, the Committee was “unconvinced” by whether doing so would actually create further work, as local authorities may already have such data.

It added that the DfT should revise funding to ensure it more accurately reflects the wear and tear of routes according to their usage, as well as make clearer where the funding is derived from.

The other recommendations include revising the DfT’s recommended practices for local authorities in consideration of future developments, such as the introduction of heavier electric lorries and autonomous vehicles; and reviewing how funding is spent.

Edmund King, president of The AA, commented: “The poor state of our roads is the number-one transport concern for 96% of drivers. This report reinforces many things The AA has been calling for. 

“We have highlighted the need for longer-term, ring-fenced investment using innovation and technology to permanently repair local roads rather than the short-term patchwork approach.

“The Committee is right to highlight the inconsistency of councils inspecting and repairing the highway. Whilst funding shouldn’t just be based on length of roads, equally we need to ensure that extra funding isn’t just given to failing highway authorities who continue to get it wrong.”

Join our WhatsApp community and be the first to read about the latest news and reviews wowing the car world. Our community is the best, easiest and most direct place to tap into the minds of Autocar, and if you join you’ll also be treated to unique WhatsApp content. You can leave at any time after joining - check our full privacy policy here.

Charlie Martin

Charlie Martin Autocar
Title: Editorial assistant, Autocar

As part of Autocar’s news desk, Charlie plays a key role in the title’s coverage of new car launches and industry events. He’s also a regular contributor to its social media channels, providing videos for Instagram, Tiktok, Facebook and Twitter.

Charlie joined Autocar in July 2022 after a nine-month stint as an apprentice with sister publication What Car?, during which he acquired his gold-standard NCTJ diploma with the Press Association.

Charlie is the proud owner of a Fiat Panda 100HP, which he swears to be the best car in the world. Until it breaks.

Join the debate

Comments
4
Add a comment…
Will86 17 January 2025
The state of our roads is a problem but unsuitable wheel and tyre combinations aren't helping either. They're more likely to suffer damage and if claims are made against councils by drivers with ultra low profile tyres, it takes away money that could be used to fix our roads. Surely drivers need to take some responsibility.
scotty5 17 January 2025

You're blaming the driver !  If the roads were properly maintained then there would be no need to claim.

The fault lies with the authorities. It's not that there's no money, it's just that money wasn't spent wisely enough. Trying to do jobs on the cheap, poor or seemingly non-existant management, lack of co-ordination between utility companies. Why tear up a road once when you can tear it up three times in as many months? 

How many times do we see a minor road repair taking over a week. A bunch of trucks turn up on a Monday, they put out cones and traffic signals, they take them away on the Friday and in between, we're lucky to seeanyone doing work. if we do, it's a group of 8 guys watching one guy work. Everysingle time I pass the roadworks at the bottom of my road, whetehr it be morning, midday or late afternoon, those workers are in their cabs reading newspapers, sleeping or on their mobiles. I haven't been to another country that works so inefficiently. Councils over here, spend vast amounts of taxpayers money doing nothing. And they get away with it.

If we want better roads, we need an overhaul in the way we go about repairing them. Whatever the cause, to blame the motorist is just insane. What next, it's the fault of EV drivers for buying heavy cars? 

00se7en 17 January 2025

You'd think they would know when roads were last resurfaced and therefore when they might need doing again.  Funding for maintenance should be the easiest of any government department as they directly tax the users through VED and Fuel Duty.  Expect the real issue is those funds being syphoned off elsewhere.

I wonder what the railways do where there are regular scheduled works and failure of tracks would be a massive safety issue.

Peter Cavellini 17 January 2025

Sorting the nation's roads is impossible, there a never ending job, filling in holes are generally a temporary thing,and the hole us appears again in a few weeks or sooner, a complete resurfacing ie too costly for the local councils to sanction.