What is it?
Kia’s first mini-MPV, the new Venga, which will be built alongside a forthcoming Hyundai sister version in Nosovice, in the Czech Republic.
Mini-MPVs represent the last word in efficient packaging; they have the cargo volume of an estate car, better passenger space than a family hatchback, added cabin flexibility, and they’re available for little more than the price of a basic family runaround. They’re the archetypal autmotive over-deliverers. So it’s odd that it’s taken automotive budget brand Kia so long to launch one; it’s nine years since Honda invented the species with the 2001 Jazz.
The Venga slots into Kia’s range slightly below the firm’s funkier Soul brother. While the latter offers style before substance, the former has a slightly longer wheelbase for greater passenger space, a taller glasshouse and a bigger boot.
The Venga will be offered with a choice of three trim levels and three engines: an 89bhp 1.4-litre petrol, an 89bhp 1.4-litre turbodiesel and an auto-only, 123bhp 1.6-litre petrol. We’re testing the turbodiesel in mid-spec trim here, because Kia expect it to be the biggest seller.
What’s it like?
Although there’s little that’s original about it, the Venga design’s is certainly a well-executed one. Outwardly it looks neat, handsome and contemporary – there’s a certain attractive something of the shrunken Ford S-Max about it.
And inside, the Venga’s got rear seats that fold, slide and recline, a false boot floor, a proliferation of storage cubbies, split A-pillars for improved forward visibility – every trick in the big book of small MPV design, in other words. It’s as roomy and as clever inside as the class standard, if not quite as cavernous or airy as Citroen’s smallest Picasso.
Fit and finish inside the Venga’s cabin is commendable, and like the outside of it, the Venga’s fascia is attractive- and modern-enough not to look cut-price. That impression falls apart a little when you begin to play around with indicator stalks and storage cubby lids; plastics are a little too shiny and hard in places, and too lacking in pleasing texture, to be really convincing.
We drove the Venga in Rome, where it displayed decent enough handling and manoeuvrability to match its fine visibility. It seemed a little stiff-legged to ride well in the UK, crashing noisily over sharp intrusions and offering little in the way of compliance. However, a subsequent test drive in the UK, in a UK-specced car on specially tuned dampers, assured us that the car will ride more comfortably here, with better rolling refinement and the capacity to soak up more of what British bitumen with throw at it.
This little Kia doesn’t put in the perfect dynamic performance. Like the Soul’s, the Venga’s electric power steering lacks genuine feel and has more weight than is called for. It also sounds and feels quite coarse under heavy throttle, lacking the mechanical refinement of a diesel-powered Citroen C3 Picasso or Nissan Note.
Should I buy one?
Not withstanding its noisy engine, the Venga does enough well enough to be mildly impressive. It would make a very fine cut-price alternative to a C3 Picasso or a Nissan Note, in fact. If only it was cheap enough.
Join the debate
Add your comment
Re: Kia Venga 1.4 CRDi
I've recently hired one of these in Austria. My heart sank when the man from Hertz handed me the keys, I'd never heard of it!
However, it wasnt that bad at all. Plenty of room, reasonable finish and refinement and it drove reasonably well. The petrol 1.4 struggled on the Grossglockner pass, but then Audi and Porsche where there doing development testing so it is quite a challenging road!
Back home they seem to be everywhere, obviously the car snob in me had filtered them out before.
Re: Kia Venga 1.4 CRDi
I drove a 1.4 crdi 90 yesterday.
Although the power is ok the engine is too noisy and the steering did not convince me at
all .
It ,s also too expensive for the type of car.
so no thank you my peugeot 307 hdi 110 drives much beter although it laks the 7 years warranty ...
Re: Kia Venga 1.4 CRDi
Yes, but is this car really worth £2000 - £2500 more than the Hyundai i20 on which its based. As someone who was seriously considering buying this car for my Father – I’m afraid my answer is no.