Currently reading: Renault, Hyundai, Mahindra and Maruti Suzuki models get zero star NCAP ratings - with videos

Big car makers fall short of the first mark in Indian NCAP crash tests, highlighting a serious shortage of safety equipment

Models from Renault, Hyundai, Mahindra and Suzuki subsidiary Maruti Suzuki have received zero star ratings in Indian NCAP tests, due to a dearth of standard safety features and structural integrity.

Popular models in India such as the Renault Kwid, Maruti Suzuki Celerio, Maruti Suzuki Eeco, Mahindra Scorpio and Hyundai Eon all received zero stars for adult occupant protection in standard specification, demonstrating how unsafe these models can be in the event of an accident.

Only the Renault Kwid received a star rating when an optional airbag was added, but at just one star it falls well short of the mark set in other regions.

More than 135,000 people are killed in road accidents every year in India.

David Ward, secretary general of Global NCAP voiced his concerns over the latest results, highlighting the involvement of some of the world’s leading car makers.

"The latest results show how important it is for cars to have a body shell that can remain stable in a crash. This is an absolutely crucial prerequisite for occupant safety together with fitment at least of front airbags.

“It is very surprising that a manufacturer like Renault introduced the Kwid initially lacking this essential feature.”

World NCAP to eradicate zero-star cars by 2020

Car makers have argued that in order for them to sell vehicles to markets such as India with low starting prices, safety equipment has to be kept optional. The Renault Kwid, for example, costs from around £3000, which is close to half the price of the UK’s cheapest new car, the Dacia Sandero. But Global NCAP argues that all cars should meet a minimum requirement, and has urged the Indian government to enforce tougher minimum standards.

“[We] strongly believe that no manufacturer anywhere in the world should be developing new models that are so clearly sub-standard,” added Ward. “Car makers must ensure that their new models pass the UN's minimum crash test regulations, and support use of an airbag.”

Most of the manufacturers involved in this latest announcement produce models in other markets with far higher safety ratings. One of Renault’s smallest European models, the Twingo, has a four star rating, and Suzuki’s European-version of the Celerio has three.

GM accused of wilful manslaughter with unsafe cars

Ward highlighted the difference in rating between the markets, again focusing on Renault: "We welcome Renault's efforts to correct this and we look forward to testing another improved version with airbags. Renault has a strong record of achievement in safety in Europe and it should offer the same commitment to its customers in India."

Back to top

India is set to create a new crash safety test procedure called the Bharat New Car Assessment Programme, which is being set up by the government and will enforce standard fitment of airbags, ABS and seat belts. The programme doesn’t kick off until 2018, however, meaning manufacturers are still able to produce zero star-rated cars for 18 more months.

Renault has now voiced its intentions to improve its models sold in India, and says a safer Kwid will be developed for further testing.

Join the debate

Comments
13
Add a comment…
bol 18 May 2016

It's the lack of passive safety that shocks me

I understand that airbags cost money, and that there's an element of personal choice, but only building in impact absorption into the side of the car that is tested is properly disgusting. Of course it's safer than a motorbike, but I'm not sure that's enough of an excuse.
Einarbb 18 May 2016

Renault Kwid is clearly with a weak crash structure...

...due to it's weight of mere 670kg. But there is no way that a 4 seat economy car that light, hence not made out of hyper expensive materials, can be structurally strong.
---Mind, this is about same weight as 1983 Daihatsu Charade.
This Kwid is a new model, and hence Nissan/Renault have no excuse.
Emilio Tony 17 May 2016

Comparing Apples and Oranges

These cars are safer than the tuk tuks, rickshaws, bicycles and mopeds most of the country can afford to use.