Vauxhall Insignia Grand Sport 2.0 Turbo 4x4 2017 first drive

From £17,1857

Range-topping Insignia hatchback gets four-wheel drive and an eight-speed automatic gearbox to go with its conspicuously well-turned styling

Nic Cackett
Nic Cackett
24 March 2017

What is it?

Having sampled the entry-level diesel Insignia Grand Sport, we move straight on to the most expensive petrol-driven version, the 2.0-litre 4x4 Turbo, which is sold exclusively in range-topping Elite Nav trim. With a 2.0-litre petrol engine and eight-speed auto, the model develops 256bhp, but the real windfall is the GKN-developed four-wheel drive system, derived from the same Twinster technology used in the Ford Focus RS.

Costing from £27,710, this go-faster variant pushes the Insignia firmly into the fringes of Audi A4 and BMW 3 Series territory, although similarly priced versions of either aren’t nearly as well equipped as the Vauxhall.

Alongside the standard family-pleasing 4G wi-fi hotspot, you also get LED matrix headlights, heated seats, a larger 8.0in touchscreen, sat-nav, dual-zone climate control, a Bose sound system and 20in alloys. 

Vxl insignia n ac 951

Related Vauxhall Insignia Grand Sport reviews

What's it like?

The last car I drove which mated a 250bhp 2.0-litre petrol engine to an eight-speed automatic was the Audi A5 Sportback we road-tested a few weeks ago, which went like stink, sounded like a suppressed gunshot and engaged each of its gears with the precision of a nine-dart finish.

The Insignia’s most notable shortcoming then is not that its powertrain is bad, but that the latest comparable backdrop is so transparently good. Trivial irks prevail in retrospect. Fast starts in the Vauxhall tend to want an old-fashioned buildup of engine revs before anything much happens; on the motorway, downshifting from the ultra-long final ratio into something more productive seems to take a while, because the 'box is a little too intent on dabbling with seventh before summoning up fifth or sixth.

Vxl insignia n ac 952

Advertisement

Latest Reviews

ford explorer review 2024 01 front tracking
Ford Explorer
7
Ford Explorer
Mazda CX 80 review 2024 01 cornering
Mazda CX-80
7
Mazda CX-80
911 01
Porsche 911
9
Porsche 911
MINI Convertible review 20 2402
Mini Cooper hatch and Convertible review
8
Mini Cooper hatch and Convertible review
bmw x3 review 2024 11 front tracking
BMW X3
7
BMW X3

View all car reviews

Back to top

Its lack of a bespoke, lever-finding ‘Sport’ mode or else paddle-shifters feels like an oversight even at half the price of the A5 Sportback. Nevertheless, this absence best demonstrates the sort of car Vauxhall actually intends the Turbo to be. Regardless of the badge, this isn't an Ingolstadt-style hard-charger - it mostly wants to be thought of as a distant relative to the long-dead big-capacity option: amenable, quiet, and just brisk enough to be considered effortless.

This it manages rather well, driven with the right kind of consideration. Like the cooking model (and much like the Vauxhall Astra, too) it is the saving in weight which makes the Insignia immediately more biddable than its predecessor, and more obviously likeable, too. Adaptive dampers are standard in the 4x4 Turbo, and in their more submissive settings, they do a remarkably worthy job of isolating occupants from the nastier side effects of the car's outsized alloys.

The four-wheel-drive system, bolstered in this case by winter tyres, feeds into much the same usable theme. The Twinster’s ability to move torque either side of an axle is intended to deliver a pleasantly neutral handling bias - but it was equally unfazed by a Norwegian blizzard, which easily qualifies the Insignia as a credible all-weather option.

Vxl insignia n ac 955

Should I buy one?

Probably the best point to make about the 4x4 Turbo is that it costs almost exactly the same as an entry-level Audi A4 with a 148bhp 1.4-litre TFSI engine, and is also significantly cheaper than the four-wheel-drive 236bhp Ford Mondeo Vignale. Against either rival, this model makes a fine case for itself, being better value and (to these eyes at least) comfortably better looking. It's also worth remembering the quantum leap made inside, where the old Insignia's ergonomic fluster has been put aside for the kind of slick interior that - while not overtly luxurious - proves virtually impossible to tire of. 

Advertisement
Back to top

Broadly speaking, the Insignia is less rewarding to drive than its badge and output might have lead you to assume – and with official fuel economy of 32.8mpg, it’s hardly setting the niche’s economy benchmark – but if those factors are lower down the list than plenty of kit, a hugely practical interior, sterling functionality and commendable all-round comfort, the priciest Grand Sport makes its own peculiar kind of plush sense. 

Vauxhall Insignia Grand Sport Elite Nav 2.0 Turbo 4x4

Price £27,710; Engine 4 cyls, 1998cc, turbocharged, petrol; Power 256bhp at 5300rpm; Torque 295lb ft at 2500-4000rpm; Gearbox Eight-speed automatic; Kerb weight 1649kg; 0-60mph 6.9sec; Top speed 155mph; Economy 32.8mpg combined; CO2/tax band 197g/km, 36%; Rivals Ford Mondeo Vignale
Advertisement

Join the debate

Comments
45
Add a comment…
Monaco Blue 18 May 2017

Confusing engine choices....

A bit confused by the engine line-up

It's disappointing to see that there's no high output diesel above the 170HP 2 Litre, surely 200HP+ could have ben possibly with a bit of remapping, but more worrying is the lack of a petrol engine to fit between the 165HP 1.5 Litre and 250HP 2 Litre. It's a huge gap in the range.
I can't see the 1.5 Litre being terribly flexible. Now the lack of the 1.6 200HP petrol engine appears to me to be a strange omission, more so as it's available in the smaller Astra.

Personally, I'd be very tempted with an SRI VxLine Tourer fitted with the 200HP engine, to replace my Saab 9-3 Sportwagon but think I'll be looking elsewhere. Shame as it's a cracking looking car!

gazza5 27 March 2017

and back to the insignia

I admit - I have a astra (the shame) but honestly in 6 years cost me nothing other than service, mot, tax and fuel.

Did look at the insignia when I changed to the astra, was a nice car - but the astra suited me better due to our road being a pain for parking.

However now I have moved its hard to keep up with the jonses of a Y reg Ford KA owned by the old dear next door and the Juke owned by the other old dear next door - oh and the golf owner next to them and the nissan quashqui next to the other next neighbour - perhaps I should just trounce them all and get a audi 1.4 tfsi to be number 1!

Back to the insignia - considered th eprevious 2.0 turbo version so would consider this one - although surely the tax etc is wrong - the mpg strikes me as worse than the current one? Does the 4x4 system add a lot of weight? Surely the 8 speed gearbox would help with economy?

Citytiger 25 March 2017

I had a Vectra

the original one that replaced the Cavalier, in Europe it was called the Vectra B, it was a black 2.5 V6 GSI estate, with black cloth Recaro seats, it looked like a hearse but went like a scalded cat, I thought it was a very under rated car, it was probably because of the review JC gave it on Top Gear. I traded that in for a Mondeo ST200, and then to an ST220, they are some of the best vehicles along with my Legacy Spec B sports Tourer I have ever driven, and having lived in Germany for over 20 years, I know how they put a lot of "prestige" badges to shame, especially on the Autobahns. The only problem I have had with them was a hub oil seal leak on the ST200. I have now matured a bit and drive Volvos, I am on my 4th and apart from routine maintenance cost have been comfortable, hassle free and bullet proof, with a good dealer around the corner if needed.