Mazda has confirmed that it will take two concepts to the Tokyo motor show later this month – one previewing the next 3, the other a dramatic sports car to showcase its next generation of design.
The brand’s Skyactiv-X powertrain is a main focus of its Tokyo motor show effort this year, with the as-yet-unnamed concept precursor to the next 3 being built on Skyactiv-Vehicle Architecture.
Striking Mazda Kai concept previews new 3 hatch for 2019
Mazda Vision Coupe previews Aston Martin-rivalling grand tourer
This further shows Mazda’s intent with the Skyactiv-X, which will gain a plug-in hybrid variant in 2021 - around the same time as the next 3 is due.
Mazda describes the concept as "a compact hatchback", but the accompanying image is unmistakably Mazda 3-sized and builds on the current-generation 3’s design and proportions, albeit more dramatically for the concept.
Less is revealed about the so-called "design vision model", which follows the rotary-powered RX Vision of the last Tokyo motor show, but Mazda confirms that the concept previews its next generation of styling. Unlike the RX Vision, however, the new concept is a four-door coupé, where the RX Vision had only two doors.
“Our stand this year marks the beginning of a new era for Mazda. We will showcase a concept model with the design and technologies that will define a whole new generation of Mazda cars. Among them is Skyactiv-X, a gasoline engine that realises a long-held dream of the global automotive industry.”
Read more:
Mazda RX-Vision rotary-engined sports car concept revealed
2017 Tokyo motor show - preview
Mazda 3 Skyactiv-X 2019 prototype review: new compression ignition petrol engine driven
Join the debate
Add your comment
Do you remember "Shinari"?
What on earth is Skyactiv-X?
I hate these meaningless terms. this one sounds more like a toothpaste, or washing powder than a car. Or is it just the engine or platform, or both?
Yes, I know that it's probably a reference to the company's compression ignition petrol engine, but why not just describe it so - instead of some gobledygook term?
And why is every styling fad referred to as a new "design language"?
Maybe I'm just old fashioned , but I think the whole industry could benefit from a bit of plain speaking so that we could really understand what they are up to.
LP in Brighton wrote:
The term "design language" is one of the most irritating and meaningless ones used (repeatedly) by motoring journalists, with "lighting signature" not far behind.