Is Lewis Hamilton Britain's greatest F1 driver?

Frankly, I don’t care what Hamilton does off the track; his greatness should be judged by what he does on it. But I will say this: a constant knock on modern F1 is that the drivers lack personality. You can’t say that about Hamilton.

When it comes to Hamilton’s on-track greatness, the arguments against will likely start with the assertion that Hamilton is a good driver who has been blessed with great cars in an era when having the best car is more important than having the most talent.

Hamilton: I'm still driving at my best

Undoubtedly, comparing drivers across generations is impossible: F1 is, essentially, an entirely different sport than it was 20 years ago, let alone 60. 

Modern cars are far more reliable, and exponentially safer, so drivers can push flat out without having to nurse their equipment, and finishing rates are higher. That makes it easier for modern drivers to rack up wins and podiums. 

There are more races, too. There are 20 races this season, compared with seven in 1950. For most of the 1980s and 1990s, there were 15 or 16 races a year, giving drivers even more chances to rack up wins and podiums.

So you can make a convincing case that Hamilton’s stats have been ‘juiced’ because of the era he’s competing in. But consider this: Hamilton’s 62 wins from 206 starts is a 30.09% win rate. That may trail Clark’s 34.72% (25 wins from 72 starts) but it puts him ahead of triple champ Stewart’s 27.27% (27 wins from 99 starts).

Mansell, second on the British race winners list, won ‘just’ 16.57% of his starts (31 from 187).

Another common argument is that the gap between the top teams and the pack has grown, enabling drivers in the fastest cars to rack up even more wins. I’m less convinced by that argument. Look back through history and F1 has often been dominated by a handful of cars and drivers. 

Still, this returns us to the argument that Hamilton has been helped by the quality of machinery he’s driven. He’s certainly been fortunate: he broke into F1 in 2007 in a title-winning McLaren-Mercedes, then switched to Mercedes-AMG, which has been the dominant team for the past four seasons. No wonder Hamilton has won at least one race in every single season – that’s 11 consecutive years.

Except that viewpoint ignores the fact that Hamilton hasn’t always driven great cars. In particular, the 2009 McLaren trailed far behind that year’s dominant machines from Brawn GP (remember them?) and Red Bull – yet Hamilton somehow won two races driving it. 

You also have to recognise that Hamilton has worked hard to be driving great cars. It was his efforts in karting that brought him to McLaren’s attention, and his success in junior categories that all but forced McLaren to hand him a race seat for 2007. And he made the most of it; not every rookie who lands in a good team does.

Consider also that many questioned Hamilton’s wisdom when he jumped from McLaren to Mercedes ahead of the 2013 season. Hamilton has won 40 races and three championships in the past five seasons. McLaren hasn’t won a race since he left.

So where does Hamilton rank among the great drivers of F1, British or otherwise? To be honest, I’m wary of the rush to place recent sporting performances in history too early. It’s only with time that we can properly consider where somone truly ranks on the 'best of' lists.

But, frankly, Hamilton has won too many races, taken too many poles and won too many championships for us to argue that he shouldn’t be considered one of the greatest drivers in the history of the sport. And it seems inconceivable that he won’t add further his tally in the coming years.

Which leaves us with this…

Lewis Hamilton is Britain’s greatest Formula 1 driver. Ever.

Discuss.

Read more

In pictures: the defining races of Lewis Hamilton's F1 career

Motorsport wrap: Hamilton clinches fourth world championship despite Mexico GP drama