A smattering of more upmarket cabin materials contributes to the same effect – on the interior door cards, centre console and instrument panel. It’s not to the extent that choosing a Ford Mustang no longer means making a clear compromise on perceived quality compared with other coupes you might spend £40,000 on, but it does make that compromise a touch easier to stomach.
We had limited chance to test the difference made to the Mustang’s outright performance level and handling on our brief test drive – and there’s a fuller review coming soon, by the way – but it’s clear that Ford’s new gearbox and engine tweak has made a clear improvement to the car’s peak acceleration. In ‘drag strip’ and ‘track’ modes the automatic version of the car becomes the perfect counterpoint to the physical, analogue challenge of launching the manual version of the car off the line.
With the auto, you simply mash the accelerator and watch as that ten-speed gearbox rifles though the ratios, keeping the V8 right in the heart of its power band. On a dry day, and figured the way us European motoring hacks do these things (at genuinely zero to 60mph, and not using America’s preferred ‘one-foot-rollout’ benchmarking technique), I suspect a 4.0sec 0-60mph run might be an optimistic expectation of this car – but it wouldn’t miss it by much.
The idea of an automatic gearbox with ten speeds fitted to a car like a Mustang V8 is admittedly a bit of a tough one to wrap your head around. To this tester, the car’s appeal has everything to do with its V8 engine and how closely you can interact with it – and I wouldn’t take the edge of that appeal by choosing a gearbox that robbed you of the involving, tactile connection of a clutch pedal or an H-pattern gearshift.
Then again, Ford isn’t taking the manual away: it’s simply broadening the car’s ability and allure by adding a better automatic for those that want one. And it’s a pretty good one. Working via four planetary gearsets rather than ten distinct ratios, it could be a shade faster when you’re shifting gears manually using the car’s paddles, but juggles ratios well in ‘D’ and ‘S’ modes. It’s also capable of dropping three or four ratios at a time when you suddenly ask for a big hit of pace, and changes gear smoothly when you’re in no particular hurry.
Join the debate
Add your comment
It already looks like a Mazda
It already looks like a Mazda from the front. It already has a Mazda engine in the range (2.3 turbo). Why not make it LIGHT like a Mazda?
It would need to be tiny as a Mazda too
Smallness and lightness tend to go together. Not sure a tiny Mustang would quite receive the same respect.
stanleyipkiss wrote:
. Have a look at the new Peugeot 5008,bit of the Mustang about it....?
stanleyipkiss wrote:
The 2.3 has no links to Mazda at all it’s Fords own engine.
Jimbbobw1977 wrote:
As I understand it, the Mustang engine is an enlarged version of the 2.0 Ecoboost. This 2.0 engine is initally derived from the Mazda L series 2.0. Although the 2.3 Mazda and 2.3 Ecoboost are not exactly the same engine, they do share the same block. It would be logical, since Mazda and Ford were at unity during the development of the Ecoboost engine many years ago ( I think early 2000s).
The first Made in the USA car...
that receives four out of five stars, as far as I can remember. Trumpski will be glad. Don't forget to go for the green Bullitt edition.
Hmmmmm...........
Still not the Mustang it should be...?, getting older, putting on weight, not as agile as it used to be?, these are the three areas where the Mustang lacks most.....