An interesting theory. Badoom-tsh. The new Lotus concept car’s name, Theory 1, makes itself ripe for plays on words, but there are a few common themes that follow show cars and concepts.
Some closely preview an upcoming model, existing to get the public – and employees – used to what could be a radical idea before a new production version arrives.
I’m thinking of the Bentley EXP 9 F, which previewed the Bentayga and made onlookers, er, draw a few breaths.
You might call these cars ‘show cars’, so named when big motor shows were still very much a part of our lives. Show cars tell us what’s just around the corner.
Then there are the more ethereal variants, the true concept cars that exist basically to explore new design languages, have a think about or experiment with the packaging of new technologies or to ponder where the market might one day be going.
I think this is what the Theory 1 is. Are you waiting for a car like it? Perhaps not just now, but something on those lines may well be along a few years from now.
I love the idea of a central driving position. My experience of them on the road is limited: a few daunting miles in a McLaren F1, some more relaxed ones in a BAC Mono, although that is basically a single-seater, which isn’t quite the same experience.
In single-seat race cars or karts, it immediately becomes something you never think about, at least for me.
Climbing from a left-hand-drive to a right-hand-drive car for the first time can be odd, because of space to a side you’re not expecting, and the fact that you’re rising into a corner when you expect to be falling. There’s something so pure about being seated in the middle of it all.
I also like the fact the Theory 1 is lighter than an Evija. Granted, 1600kg is still not a number with which traditional Lotus cars were familiar, but it’s a step change in the right direction.
Ah, yes, the Evija. “We’re doing this to explore the brand, but there’s also going to be a real market need at some point,” said Lotus designer Ben Hall about the Theory 1. But when will that point come?
What the new car does manage to achieve is offer a reduced capability over the Evija, to be a supercar rather than a hypercar.
Join the debate
Add your comment
So, as said , they are irrelevant,but also, what affect do they have on what we drive?, does the technology they develop trickle down to our cars?
Yet another repackaging of the Autocar mantra: "old stuff is good, new ideas are scary". If you guys had been around when the Ford Model T was launched, you would have been ranting about how you were sticking with your horse and cart.
Rimac has indeed let the cat out of the bag on this issue. The new Bugatti is testament to that.
To some extent, EV hypercars are subject to the same laws of gravity as low cost EVs, especially for depreciation and the probability of fast obsolescence due to changes in EV tech.
Although the McLaren P1 was a hybrid, I can't help thinking that the problems with and runnning costs of thd P1 colour how potential EV hypercar buyers might view current and future EV hypercars.
That said, there is no getting away from the fact an EV supercar or hypercar has a power train that lacks the emotion and character of the best ICE cars to date.