Hark: the sound of change is afoot.
What has been standard in That London for many, many years might soon be coming to the provinces, introducing a new method of thinking to our towns and villages. No, not ‘being allowed into nightclubs wearing trainers’ or ‘the chance to eat out after 9.30pm’, but something rather more mundane. Something, I might say, rather more ominous.
I give you Rule 244 of the Highway Code. You remember that one. It’s a classic. “You must not park partially or wholly on the pavement in London,” it reads, “and should not do so elsewhere unless signs permit it.”
It’s the “should not do so elsewhere” part of things that could be changing. “Should not” means that it isn’t technically illegal to stick two wheels on a pavement, so you can, though if you’re causing an obstruction, you can get a parking ticket for it. So use your nous.
This is fairly standard, sensible-sounding stuff, right?
Perhaps not. The Department for Transport is considering whether to roll out a ‘must not’ pavement parking rule for the entire country, except on roads where local authorities issue a specific exemption.
Apparently, many local councils have been pushing for a blanket ban.
Why? Well, the problem is that, as the Code goes on to explain, “parking on the pavement can obstruct and seriously inconvenience pedestrians, people in wheelchairs or with visual impairments and people with prams and pushchairs”. Of course it can.
But what parking on the pavement can also mean – and half an hour picking out random villages on Google Street View will give you tens, hundreds, thousands of examples – is that on narrow roads that have pavement or verge width to spare, or near the ends of culs-de-sac where nobody walks, or in areas where car quantities outnumber spaces, it makes life a bit easier for everybody. It can allow traffic to get past more easily, means people don’t have to annoy their neighbours by parking in front of their houses: all while, actually, not blocking paths or inconveniencing anybody in any way.
A law change would remove that ability; remove that discretion: “Sorry, your wheels are on the pavement. You’re ticketed, mate” – whether it’s a nuisance to others, or actually useful to others. Why would you want to make that change?
Join the debate
Add your comment
Pavement parking
.
I drive all over the UK and I don't park on pavements. Never needed to. If a road is narrow meaning I'll cause an obstruction if parked there I park somewhere else, not on the pavement. I can't stand it when I see Mothers/Fathers with buggies having to take to the street to pass a car parked on the pavement, let alone wheelchair users. The exceptions are when pavements are specifically marked out with parking bays.
Days gone by.....
Most small Villages,Towns were never designed for Cars and the like, two hundred years ago a Traffic was a Horse n Cart, no need for Parking then ,now though in most places People living there have two three Cars per Household there’s no room for off street parking, the streets are usually narrow made worse by Cars parked down both sides and there are rarely Public Carparks and if there is it might only hold twenty, thirty Cars, it’s a busier World more mobile, these places can’t cope, fining for just plain stupid parking is fine by me, whether it stops them is another matter....