Currently reading: Everyday handling heroes - Hot hatchbacks on test

Peugeot's new 208 GTi by Peugeot Sport takes on the Mini Cooper John Cooper Works, Renault's Clio RS 220 Trophy and the Vauxhall Corsa VXR

You’ve come to the right place. Whether you’re looking for outright performance, distinguishing driver engagement, striking hardcore character, real-world usability, bang-for-your-buck value or just a bit of variety, you’ll find it in this year’s market for souped-up superminis.

You’ll probably be looking for all of the above, though – because why wouldn’t you?

But part of you might be thinking that unless you spend every penny of the notional £30,000 we allow for this exercise on either as much power as you can lay your hands on or on something with driven rear wheels, you’ll be cheating yourself. Not so. In fact, buying the very best affordable driver’s car for you may well be impossible without first recognising the need for more sophisticated thinking.

Not necessarily accepting compromised performance credentials, though. On 0-62mph acceleration, for example, the Vauxhall Corsa VXR, Peugeot 208 GTi by Peugeot Sport, Renault Clio RS 220 Trophy and Mini John Cooper Works need acknowledge only the Caterham Seven 270R and Honda Civic Type R as their superiors. These are pocket rockets in the truest sense: they’re all quick.

All four superminis also have two rows of seats and proper hatchback rear ends with split folding rear chairs, making them much more usable than the rear-drive brigade. Meanwhile, only by buying one of these superminis will you end up in a car capable of bettering a real-world 40mpg one moment before glugging down the 98RON and pinning your ears back the next.

But before we get onto what these four do, a quick note about what they are. The Clio Trophy is the only car here with five doors and, by dint of that, the most practical. The Mini is the least practical, primarily because it has the smallest boot, but it has more brand allure and design appeal than the rest put together. 

Neither the Vauxhall nor the Peugeot tempts particularly at first, although we must acknowledge 
that the 208’s two-tone ‘coupé franche’ paint job is optional. But why you’d pay £945 extra to make your hot hatch look like a dipped strawberry is beyond us.

Every great hot hatch needs a belting engine. The Mini JCW is at an obvious advantage, having the most swept volume, most power and most torque. In practice, the quality of the Mini’s engine shows itself as remarkable smoothness and flexibility as much as outright pace. There’s no peakiness to its delivery at all.The Mini finds plenty of traction, too, although its optional six-speed automatic gearbox frustrates.

The standard JCW uses a six-speed manual ’box, but BMW couldn’t supply a manual car for this test and the auto isn’t well suited to a tight track like Bedford Autodrome’s East Circuit. In paddle-shift mode, it can be a touch obstinate, declining to downshift close to the redline or to save upshifts until your prevailing speed has come down.

Back to top

The second best engine here isn’t so easily guessed. Fact is the Peugeot probably has the best powertrain all round, its simple manual gearbox scoring points on usability where the more ‘sophisticated’ transmissions of others fall down. The 208’s engine pulls harder than its headline figures imply. It also revs freely, responds smartly to the pedal and sounds nicely waspish at high revs.

The Renaultsport-fettled Clio’s 1.6-litre turbocharged motor does enough to relegate the Vauxhall’s thirsty, occasionally breathless, booming engine into also-ran position, but it ought to do more. Truth is the quirks and shortcomings of the Clio’s engine and dual-clutch automatic gearbox are many and various.

Flat out on track in manual mode, both work fine. Bumbling along in no particular hurry on the road in ‘D’, the same is true. But the vast majority of miles are, of course, driven in modes and moods between the two and the Clio doesn’t cover them as consummately, decisively or forcefully as it should.

The engine feels ever so slightly weak through the mid-range. It revs hard enough in the farther reaches, but you don’t expect to have to work a turbocharged engine so cruelly to make it give its best. More annoying still are the oddly spaced ratios of the dual-clutch ’box and the dead zone at top of the brake pedal’s travel. Renault has improved the haptic feel of the gearshift paddles and cut shift times somewhat but this gearbox is still a long way from what the defining modern hot hatch deserves.

With a decent manual gearbox, the Clio Trophy would have walked this contest. The car’s fluent, biddable handling and beautifully weighted, gently communicative steering are both outstanding.

On track, it’s easily the most natural, controllable and engaging prospect here. It shuns the contrived hyper-responsiveness of its rivals and instead bleeds in towards every apex with just enough body roll to load up its outside rear wheel, and to neutralise its cornering attitude on a trailing throttle, giving its driver options. The car never wants for stability. It’s just balanced and progressive enough to respond with some playful slip angle when you’ve had enough of slow in, fast out.

Back to top

The Peugeot’s track handling can be playful, too. Fitted with wider tracks, shorter and stiffer springs and bigger rims than the standard GTi, the 208 GTi by Peugeot Sport is, in 
its own way, almost as engaging as the Clio. It has a much less delicate, less precise, more naughty temperament, though.

With just two full turns between locks, the steering is direct, heavy and lively with feedback. Turn-in is more immediate than in the Clio and front-end grip is a smidgen greater. Mid-corner stability is less secure, no doubt due to the overrun characteristics of the car’s helical limited-slip differential.

Under power, that diff gives the 208’s front wheels an unshakable hold on the asphalt, but at other times, it makes the handling quite sudden and unforgiving. Likewise, the car’s stiff springing and aggressive damping make it a handful on a bumpy road.

Although the Mini and Corsa are more fluent-riding and easy-going on the road than the 208, they both fail to make a lasting dynamic impression. In the Mini’s case, it isn’t for want of trying. The JCW’s ride is unexpectedly supple and composed, provided you avoid Sport mode. Disappointing lateral grip levels and the usual extra-fast, feedback-starved steering system ultimately leave you wanting more, though.

The Corsa feels more pragmatic than its rivals and handles fast road driving quite well. We opted to test the car in standard specification, without the stiffer springs, stickier tyres and slippy diff of Vauxhall’s Performance Pack. On the track, that made the car frustratingly short on traction, and relatively short on chassis response and body control. Would it have finished higher in the order in richer trim? Maybe, but probably only by a place.

And so, in the absence of the defining hot hatchback, the Renault Clio RS 220 Trophy gets the nod. 
Its chassis and steering are very special indeed, at least partly redeeming what remains a flawed powertrain, and outshining its nearest rivals quite plainly. But it’ll face a tougher contest against the Mazda MX-5 and Civic Type R.

Everyday handling heroes - Caterham 270R versus Toyota GT86 and Mazda MX-5

Everyday handling heroes - Honda Civic Type R versus Ford Focus ST-2

Everyday handling heroes - How much fun can be had for £30,000?

Mini John Cooper Works Auto

Price £24,380; Engine 4 cyls, 1998cc, turbocharged, petrol; Power 228bhp at 5200-6000rpm; Torque 236lb ft at 1250-4800rpm; Gearbox 6-speed automatic; Kerb weight 1295kg; 0-62mph 6.1sec; Top speed 153mph; Economy 49.6mpg; CO2/tax band 133g/km/21%

Vauxhall Corsa VXR

Price £18,245; Engine 4 cyls, 1598cc, turbocharged, petrol; Power 202bhp at 5800rpm; Torque 207lb ft at 190-5800rpm; Gearbox 6-speed manual; Kerb weight 1278kg; 0-62mph 6.5sec; Top speed 143mph; Economy 37.7mpg; CO2/tax band 174g/km/29%

Peugeot 208 GTi by Peugeot Sport

Price £21,995; Engine 4 cyls, 1598cc, turbocharged, petrol; Power 205bhp at 6000rpm; Torque 221lb ft at 3000rpm; Gearbox 6-speed manual; Kerb weight 1160kg; 0-62mph 6.5sec; Top speed 143mph; Economy 52.3mpg; CO2/tax band 125g/km/20%

Renault Clio RS 220 Trophy

Price £21,780; Engine 4 cyls, 1618cc, turbocharged, petrol; Power 217bhp at 6050rpm; Torque 207lb ft at 2000rpm; Gearbox 6-speed dual-clutch; Kerb weight 1204kg; 0-62mph 6.6sec; Top speed 146mph; Economy 47.9mpg; CO2/tax band 135g/km/22%

Get the latest car news, reviews and galleries from Autocar direct to your inbox every week. Enter your email address below:

Join our WhatsApp community and be the first to read about the latest news and reviews wowing the car world. Our community is the best, easiest and most direct place to tap into the minds of Autocar, and if you join you’ll also be treated to unique WhatsApp content. You can leave at any time after joining - check our full privacy policy here.

Matt Saunders

Matt Saunders Autocar
Title: Road test editor

As Autocar’s chief car tester and reviewer, it’s Matt’s job to ensure the quality, objectivity, relevance and rigour of the entirety of Autocar’s reviews output, as well contributing a great many detailed road tests, group tests and drive reviews himself.

Matt has been an Autocar staffer since the autumn of 2003, and has been lucky enough to work alongside some of the magazine’s best-known writers and contributors over that time. He served as staff writer, features editor, assistant editor and digital editor, before joining the road test desk in 2011.

Since then he’s driven, measured, lap-timed, figured, and reported on cars as varied as the Bugatti Veyron, Rolls-Royce PhantomTesla RoadsterAriel Hipercar, Tata Nano, McLaren SennaRenault Twizy and Toyota Mirai. Among his wider personal highlights of the job have been covering Sebastien Loeb’s record-breaking run at Pikes Peak in 2013; doing 190mph on derestricted German autobahn in a Brabus Rocket; and driving McLaren’s legendary ‘XP5’ F1 prototype. His own car is a trusty Mazda CX-5.

Join the debate

Comments
7
Add a comment…
bowsersheepdog 17 September 2015

Heffalump in the room

I can't believe people are complaining at the Fiesta's absence. Don't you read enough about it? It makes a refreshing change for Autocar to write an article about small hatchbacks without bumming the Fiesta's load while ignoring the cars about which they are supposedly writing. This should be encouraged, not discouraged.
gazza5 14 September 2015

prices

and not to jump on the vxr bandwagon - the performance pack brings the price up closer to the others anyway. Save 3500 odd going for the corsa. As others have said - why no ST fiesta its suppose to be the best hot hatch.
mr_pushrod 14 September 2015

Odd decision

It seems a bit bizarre that you'd spec the Corsa without the Performance Pack especially with much of the testing done on track. I've just tried one and although I agree about the soulless engine, traction was never an issue and nor was body control. I'm by no means a Vauxhall fanboy however it seems slightly unfair on the VXR.