Aston Martin chief executive Andy Palmer talks exclusively to Autocar following the announcement that billionaire Lawrence Stroll is investing in the firm this morning.
When did you conclude negotiations?
“I’m getting too old for all-nighters, but let’s just say it was a late night! It has been time-consuming, but as I sit here now the company is better funded than it has ever been in the past, with a good product cadence in plan as per the second century plan and with a commitment to build our own V6 hybrid in the UK. That is compelling.”
We understand you had rival bidders to consider, so why choose Lawrence Stroll?
“Lawrence and his consortium are a group of pretty big names and it is a great sign of confidence in Aston Martin and our plan that they have invested in us. They have huge experience in luxury brands, and as much as anything that gives the company - and me personally - a group of mentors to work with.
“On a more personal level, Lawrence shares a lot of my beliefs and passions. He was clear that the mid-engined plans had to progress, he has a passion for F1, and F1’s ability to sell cars for you, he can see the value of the hybrid V6 and more. And he loves cars; he’s an investor who wants to engage. There would be nothing worse than a disengaged investor.”
Is his investment enough to do what you want?
“To this plan, yes. It allows us to once and for all start doing the right things, chief among them controlling supply and demand in a way that Ferrari has demonstrated can be so effective. In the past we have had a balance sheet that has required us to push wholesales to pay our bills. Now we can reset, reduce our stock and start operating properly.”
Shouldn’t you have done that before?
“We had to pay our bills, most notably the one to build a new factory. We made that decision in 2016 when the going was good and were committed to it. You can’t build a new factory and a new SUV that’s true to your values by cutting corners. The costs were fixed in a bullish market that turned to crap.”
How bad was last year?
“Very. Our retail sales were up 12%, our marketshare was up in a lot of markets, but the slice of the pie was less and the profitability of what we sold not good enough. The list goes on. It was a bad year.”
Don’t you have to take the responsibility for that?
“Yes. I’m chief executive. I’m responsible for that and for where we are. Clearly there were factors I couldn’t control, which affected almost every luxury car maker, but it is absolutely my responsibility to get us through this.”
Join the debate
Add your comment
there is some rubbish posted
there is some rubbish posted here, but when you see from who it is clearly no surprise.
jonboy4969 wrote:
Jonboy this is an article about Aston Martin about which you know less about than JLR which could fit on a postage stamp
As I work for JLR and have
Executive Chairman mmmm
Executive Chairman mmmm - So Stroll is running the show now
The worry for me is that
The worry for me is that Aston get into a situation where they don't have the cash they need to pour into long term development ultimately it comes back and bites you, the automotive world is full of examples like that.
It why Tata have been so good for JLR and Geely for Volvo. They've never starved them of investment.
TStag wrote:
Tata good for JLR, you are joking.
JLR and has been kept afloat by government grants.
Mad as a hatter
Hughbl wrote:
JLR have kept themselves afloat by tinkering around the edges of the platform Ford paid for back when they owned the brand.
Tata have done little more than cream off profits, until 2017 when the music suddenly stopped.
By some miracle they stayed afloat and have managed to get some of the profits back without Tata's creaming off the top for a short period. They'll want their cow to start making cream again before long though....
Agreed however, Aston need a mothership - they should have waited and taken Geeley's offer.
Tinker
Didn't know the I-Pace had a Ford Platform, or the new one in the Evoque!
xxxx wrote:
The I-Pace is a white elephant, built on a bespoke platform not even developed by JLR - and at the last check to be scrapped in favour of MLA in future.
The new Evoque is based on PTA - which remains a development of D8. Admittedly more than tinkering around teh edges, but the real change occured about 6 years later than it should have. Tata refused to offer funding till they ABSOLUTELY had to.
Running a premium automaker on the cheap is ridiculous - and clearly shows in the product.